Background ChatGPT is a large language model (LLM) based on artificial intelligence (AI) capable of responding in multiple languages and generating nuanced and highly complex responses. While ChatGPT holds promising applications in medical education, its limitations and potential risks cannot be ignored.
Methods A scoping review was conducted for English articles discussing ChatGPT in the context of medical education published after 2022. A literature search was performed using PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science databases, and information was extracted from the relevant studies that were ultimately included.
Results ChatGPT exhibits various potential applications in medical education, such as providing personalized learning plans and materials, creating clinical practice simulation scenarios, and assisting in writing articles. However, challenges associated with academic integrity, data accuracy, and potential harm to learning were also highlighted in the literature. The paper emphasizes certain recommendations for using ChatGPT, including the establishment of guidelines. Based on the review, 3 key research areas were proposed: cultivating the ability of medical students to use ChatGPT correctly, integrating ChatGPT into teaching activities and processes, and proposing standards for the use of AI by medical students.
Conclusion ChatGPT has the potential to transform medical education, but careful consideration is required for its full integration. To harness the full potential of ChatGPT in medical education, attention should not only be given to the capabilities of AI but also to its impact on students and teachers.
Purpose The objective of this study was to assess the performance of ChatGPT (GPT-4) on all items, including those with diagrams, in the Japanese National License Examination for Pharmacists (JNLEP) and compare it with the previous GPT-3.5 model’s performance.
Methods The 107th JNLEP, conducted in 2022, with 344 items input into the GPT-4 model, was targeted for this study. Separately, 284 items, excluding those with diagrams, were entered into the GPT-3.5 model. The answers were categorized and analyzed to determine accuracy rates based on categories, subjects, and presence or absence of diagrams. The accuracy rates were compared to the main passing criteria (overall accuracy rate ≥62.9%).
Results The overall accuracy rate for all items in the 107th JNLEP in GPT-4 was 72.5%, successfully meeting all the passing criteria. For the set of items without diagrams, the accuracy rate was 80.0%, which was significantly higher than that of the GPT-3.5 model (43.5%). The GPT-4 model demonstrated an accuracy rate of 36.1% for items that included diagrams.
Conclusion Advancements that allow GPT-4 to process images have made it possible for LLMs to answer all items in medical-related license examinations. This study’s findings confirm that ChatGPT (GPT-4) possesses sufficient knowledge to meet the passing criteria.
Purpose This study assessed the performance of 6 generative artificial intelligence (AI) platforms on the learning objectives of medical arthropodology in a parasitology class in Korea. We examined the AI platforms’ performance by querying in Korean and English to determine their information amount, accuracy, and relevance in prompts in both languages.
Methods From December 15 to 17, 2023, 6 generative AI platforms—Bard, Bing, Claude, Clova X, GPT-4, and Wrtn—were tested on 7 medical arthropodology learning objectives in English and Korean. Clova X and Wrtn are platforms from Korean companies. Responses were evaluated using specific criteria for the English and Korean queries.
Results Bard had abundant information but was fourth in accuracy and relevance. GPT-4, with high information content, ranked first in accuracy and relevance. Clova X was 4th in amount but 2nd in accuracy and relevance. Bing provided less information, with moderate accuracy and relevance. Wrtn’s answers were short, with average accuracy and relevance. Claude AI had reasonable information, but lower accuracy and relevance. The responses in English were superior in all aspects. Clova X was notably optimized for Korean, leading in relevance.
Conclusion In a study of 6 generative AI platforms applied to medical arthropodology, GPT-4 excelled overall, while Clova X, a Korea-based AI product, achieved 100% relevance in Korean queries, the highest among its peers. Utilizing these AI platforms in classrooms improved the authors’ self-efficacy and interest in the subject, offering a positive experience of interacting with generative AI platforms to question and receive information.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Opportunities, challenges, and future directions of large language models, including ChatGPT in medical education: a systematic scoping review Xiaojun Xu, Yixiao Chen, Jing Miao Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2024; 21: 6. CrossRef
This study aims to explore ChatGPT’s (GPT-3.5 version) functionalities, including reinforcement learning, diverse applications, and limitations. ChatGPT is an artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot powered by OpenAI’s Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) model. The chatbot’s applications span education, programming, content generation, and more, demonstrating its versatility. ChatGPT can improve education by creating assignments and offering personalized feedback, as shown by its notable performance in medical exams and the United States Medical Licensing Exam. However, concerns include plagiarism, reliability, and educational disparities. It aids in various research tasks, from design to writing, and has shown proficiency in summarizing and suggesting titles. Its use in scientific writing and language translation is promising, but professional oversight is needed for accuracy and originality. It assists in programming tasks like writing code, debugging, and guiding installation and updates. It offers diverse applications, from cheering up individuals to generating creative content like essays, news articles, and business plans. Unlike search engines, ChatGPT provides interactive, generative responses and understands context, making it more akin to human conversation, in contrast to conventional search engines’ keyword-based, non-interactive nature. ChatGPT has limitations, such as potential bias, dependence on outdated data, and revenue generation challenges. Nonetheless, ChatGPT is considered to be a transformative AI tool poised to redefine the future of generative technology. In conclusion, advancements in AI, such as ChatGPT, are altering how knowledge is acquired and applied, marking a shift from search engines to creativity engines. This transformation highlights the increasing importance of AI literacy and the ability to effectively utilize AI in various domains of life.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Opportunities, challenges, and future directions of large language models, including ChatGPT in medical education: a systematic scoping review Xiaojun Xu, Yixiao Chen, Jing Miao Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2024; 21: 6. CrossRef
Artificial Intelligence: Fundamentals and Breakthrough Applications in Epilepsy Wesley Kerr, Sandra Acosta, Patrick Kwan, Gregory Worrell, Mohamad A. Mikati Epilepsy Currents.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
ChatGPT (GPT-3.5) has entered higher education and there is a need to determine how to use it effectively. This descriptive study compared the ability of GPT-3.5 and teachers to answer questions from dental students and construct detailed intended learning outcomes. When analyzed according to a Likert scale, we found that GPT-3.5 answered the questions from dental students in a similar or even more elaborate way compared to the answers that had previously been provided by a teacher. GPT-3.5 was also asked to construct detailed intended learning outcomes for a course in microbial pathogenesis, and when these were analyzed according to a Likert scale they were, to a large degree, found irrelevant. Since students are using GPT-3.5, it is important that instructors learn how to make the best use of it both to be able to advise students and to benefit from its potential.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Opportunities, challenges, and future directions of large language models, including ChatGPT in medical education: a systematic scoping review Xiaojun Xu, Yixiao Chen, Jing Miao Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2024; 21: 6. CrossRef
Information amount, accuracy, and relevance of generative artificial intelligence platforms’ answers regarding learning objectives of medical arthropodology evaluated in English and Korean queries in December 2023: a descriptive study Hyunju Lee, Soobin Park Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2023; 20: 39. CrossRef
Purpose We aimed to describe the performance and evaluate the educational value of justifications provided by artificial intelligence chatbots, including GPT-3.5, GPT-4, Bard, Claude, and Bing, on the Peruvian National Medical Licensing Examination (P-NLME).
Methods This was a cross-sectional analytical study. On July 25, 2023, each multiple-choice question (MCQ) from the P-NLME was entered into each chatbot (GPT-3, GPT-4, Bing, Bard, and Claude) 3 times. Then, 4 medical educators categorized the MCQs in terms of medical area, item type, and whether the MCQ required Peru-specific knowledge. They assessed the educational value of the justifications from the 2 top performers (GPT-4 and Bing).
Results GPT-4 scored 86.7% and Bing scored 82.2%, followed by Bard and Claude, and the historical performance of Peruvian examinees was 55%. Among the factors associated with correct answers, only MCQs that required Peru-specific knowledge had lower odds (odds ratio, 0.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.09–0.61), whereas the remaining factors showed no associations. In assessing the educational value of justifications provided by GPT-4 and Bing, neither showed any significant differences in certainty, usefulness, or potential use in the classroom.
Conclusion Among chatbots, GPT-4 and Bing were the top performers, with Bing performing better at Peru-specific MCQs. Moreover, the educational value of justifications provided by the GPT-4 and Bing could be deemed appropriate. However, it is essential to start addressing the educational value of these chatbots, rather than merely their performance on examinations.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Performance of GPT-4V in Answering the Japanese Otolaryngology Board Certification Examination Questions: Evaluation Study Masao Noda, Takayoshi Ueno, Ryota Koshu, Yuji Takaso, Mari Dias Shimada, Chizu Saito, Hisashi Sugimoto, Hiroaki Fushiki, Makoto Ito, Akihiro Nomura, Tomokazu Yoshizaki JMIR Medical Education.2024; 10: e57054. CrossRef
Response to Letter to the Editor re: “Artificial Intelligence Versus Expert Plastic Surgeon: Comparative Study Shows ChatGPT ‘Wins' Rhinoplasty Consultations: Should We Be Worried? [1]” by Durairaj et al. Kay Durairaj, Omer Baker Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Opportunities, challenges, and future directions of large language models, including ChatGPT in medical education: a systematic scoping review Xiaojun Xu, Yixiao Chen, Jing Miao Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2024; 21: 6. CrossRef
Information amount, accuracy, and relevance of generative artificial intelligence platforms’ answers regarding learning objectives of medical arthropodology evaluated in English and Korean queries in December 2023: a descriptive study Hyunju Lee, Soobin Park Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2023; 20: 39. CrossRef
Purpose This study aimed to analyze patterns of using ChatGPT before and after group activities and to explore medical students’ perceptions of ChatGPT as a feedback tool in the classroom.
Methods The study included 99 2nd-year pre-medical students who participated in a “Leadership and Communication” course from March to June 2023. Students engaged in both individual and group activities related to negotiation strategies. ChatGPT was used to provide feedback on their solutions. A survey was administered to assess students’ perceptions of ChatGPT’s feedback, its use in the classroom, and the strengths and challenges of ChatGPT from May 17 to 19, 2023.
Results The students responded by indicating that ChatGPT’s feedback was helpful, and revised and resubmitted their group answers in various ways after receiving feedback. The majority of respondents expressed agreement with the use of ChatGPT during class. The most common response concerning the appropriate context of using ChatGPT’s feedback was “after the first round of discussion, for revisions.” There was a significant difference in satisfaction with ChatGPT’s feedback, including correctness, usefulness, and ethics, depending on whether or not ChatGPT was used during class, but there was no significant difference according to gender or whether students had previous experience with ChatGPT. The strongest advantages were “providing answers to questions” and “summarizing information,” and the worst disadvantage was “producing information without supporting evidence.”
Conclusion The students were aware of the advantages and disadvantages of ChatGPT, and they had a positive attitude toward using ChatGPT in the classroom.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Opportunities, challenges, and future directions of large language models, including ChatGPT in medical education: a systematic scoping review Xiaojun Xu, Yixiao Chen, Jing Miao Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2024; 21: 6. CrossRef
Embracing ChatGPT for Medical Education: Exploring Its Impact on Doctors and Medical Students Yijun Wu, Yue Zheng, Baijie Feng, Yuqi Yang, Kai Kang, Ailin Zhao JMIR Medical Education.2024; 10: e52483. CrossRef
ChatGPT and Clinical Training: Perception, Concerns, and Practice of Pharm-D Students Mohammed Zawiah, Fahmi Al-Ashwal, Lobna Gharaibeh, Rana Abu Farha, Karem Alzoubi, Khawla Abu Hammour, Qutaiba A Qasim, Fahd Abrah Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare.2023; Volume 16: 4099. CrossRef
Information amount, accuracy, and relevance of generative artificial intelligence platforms’ answers regarding learning objectives of medical arthropodology evaluated in English and Korean queries in December 2023: a descriptive study Hyunju Lee, Soobin Park Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2023; 20: 39. CrossRef
Purpose This study aimed to assess the performance of ChatGPT (GPT-3.5 and GPT-4) as a study tool in solving biostatistical problems and to identify any potential drawbacks that might arise from using ChatGPT in medical education, particularly in solving practical biostatistical problems.
Methods ChatGPT was tested to evaluate its ability to solve biostatistical problems from the Handbook of Medical Statistics by Peacock and Peacock in this descriptive study. Tables from the problems were transformed into textual questions. Ten biostatistical problems were randomly chosen and used as text-based input for conversation with ChatGPT (versions 3.5 and 4).
Results GPT-3.5 solved 5 practical problems in the first attempt, related to categorical data, cross-sectional study, measuring reliability, probability properties, and the t-test. GPT-3.5 failed to provide correct answers regarding analysis of variance, the chi-square test, and sample size within 3 attempts. GPT-4 also solved a task related to the confidence interval in the first attempt and solved all questions within 3 attempts, with precise guidance and monitoring.
Conclusion The assessment of both versions of ChatGPT performance in 10 biostatistical problems revealed that GPT-3.5 and 4’s performance was below average, with correct response rates of 5 and 6 out of 10 on the first attempt. GPT-4 succeeded in providing all correct answers within 3 attempts. These findings indicate that students must be aware that this tool, even when providing and calculating different statistical analyses, can be wrong, and they should be aware of ChatGPT’s limitations and be careful when incorporating this model into medical education.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Can Generative AI and ChatGPT Outperform Humans on Cognitive-Demanding Problem-Solving Tasks in Science? Xiaoming Zhai, Matthew Nyaaba, Wenchao Ma Science & Education.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Opportunities, challenges, and future directions of large language models, including ChatGPT in medical education: a systematic scoping review Xiaojun Xu, Yixiao Chen, Jing Miao Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2024; 21: 6. CrossRef
Learning about one’s implicit bias is crucial for improving one’s cultural competency and thereby reducing health inequity. To evaluate bias among medical students following a previously developed cultural training program targeting New Zealand Māori, we developed a text-based, self-evaluation tool called the Similarity Rating Test (SRT). The development process of the SRT was resource-intensive, limiting its generalizability and applicability. Here, we explored the potential of ChatGPT, an automated chatbot, to assist in the development process of the SRT by comparing ChatGPT’s and students’ evaluations of the SRT. Despite results showing non-significant equivalence and difference between ChatGPT’s and students’ ratings, ChatGPT’s ratings were more consistent than students’ ratings. The consistency rate was higher for non-stereotypical than for stereotypical statements, regardless of rater type. Further studies are warranted to validate ChatGPT’s potential for assisting in SRT development for implementation in medical education and evaluation of ethnic stereotypes and related topics.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Efficacy and limitations of ChatGPT as a biostatistical problem-solving tool in medical education in Serbia: a descriptive study Aleksandra Ignjatović, Lazar Stevanović Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2023; 20: 28. CrossRef
At the end of 2022, the appearance of ChatGPT, an artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot with amazing writing ability, caused a great sensation in academia. The chatbot turned out to be very capable, but also capable of deception, and the news broke that several researchers had listed the chatbot (including its earlier version) as co-authors of their academic papers. In response, Nature and Science expressed their position that this chatbot cannot be listed as an author in the papers they publish. Since an AI chatbot is not a human being, in the current legal system, the text automatically generated by an AI chatbot cannot be a copyrighted work; thus, an AI chatbot cannot be an author of a copyrighted work. Current AI chatbots such as ChatGPT are much more advanced than search engines in that they produce original text, but they still remain at the level of a search engine in that they cannot take responsibility for their writing. For this reason, they also cannot be authors from the perspective of research ethics.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Risks of abuse of large language models, like ChatGPT, in scientific publishing: Authorship, predatory publishing, and paper mills Graham Kendall, Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva Learned Publishing.2024; 37(1): 55. CrossRef
Can ChatGPT be an author? A study of artificial intelligence authorship policies in top academic journals Brady D. Lund, K.T. Naheem Learned Publishing.2024; 37(1): 13. CrossRef
The Role of AI in Writing an Article and Whether it Can Be a Co-author: What if it Gets Support From 2 Different AIs Like ChatGPT and Google Bard for the Same Theme? İlhan Bahşi, Ayşe Balat Journal of Craniofacial Surgery.2024; 35(1): 274. CrossRef
Artificial Intelligence–Generated Scientific Literature: A Critical Appraisal Justyna Zybaczynska, Matthew Norris, Sunjay Modi, Jennifer Brennan, Pooja Jhaveri, Timothy J. Craig, Taha Al-Shaikhly The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice.2024; 12(1): 106. CrossRef
Does Google’s Bard Chatbot perform better than ChatGPT on the European hand surgery exam? Goetsch Thibaut, Armaghan Dabbagh, Philippe Liverneaux International Orthopaedics.2024; 48(1): 151. CrossRef
A Brief Review of the Efficacy in Artificial Intelligence and Chatbot-Generated Personalized Fitness Regimens Daniel K. Bays, Cole Verble, Kalyn M. Powers Verble Strength & Conditioning Journal.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Academic publisher guidelines on AI usage: A ChatGPT supported thematic analysis Mike Perkins, Jasper Roe F1000Research.2024; 12: 1398. CrossRef
The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Writing Scientific Review Articles Melissa A. Kacena, Lilian I. Plotkin, Jill C. Fehrenbacher Current Osteoporosis Reports.2024; 22(1): 115. CrossRef
Using AI to Write a Review Article Examining the Role of the Nervous System on Skeletal Homeostasis and Fracture Healing Murad K. Nazzal, Ashlyn J. Morris, Reginald S. Parker, Fletcher A. White, Roman M. Natoli, Jill C. Fehrenbacher, Melissa A. Kacena Current Osteoporosis Reports.2024; 22(1): 217. CrossRef
GenAI et al.: Cocreation, Authorship, Ownership, Academic Ethics and Integrity in a Time of Generative AI Aras Bozkurt Open Praxis.2024; 16(1): 1. CrossRef
An integrative decision-making framework to guide policies on regulating ChatGPT usage Umar Ali Bukar, Md Shohel Sayeed, Siti Fatimah Abdul Razak, Sumendra Yogarayan, Oluwatosin Ahmed Amodu PeerJ Computer Science.2024; 10: e1845. CrossRef
Artificial Intelligence and Its Role in Medical Research Anurag Gola, Ambarish Das, Amar B. Gumataj, S. Amirdhavarshini, J. Venkatachalam Current Medical Issues.2024; 22(2): 97. CrossRef
From advancements to ethics: Assessing ChatGPT’s role in writing research paper Vasu Gupta, Fnu Anamika, Kinna Parikh, Meet A Patel, Rahul Jain, Rohit Jain Turkish Journal of Internal Medicine.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Yapay Zekânın Edebiyatta Kullanım Serüveni Nesime Ceyhan Akça, Serap Aslan Cobutoğlu, Özlem Yeşim Özbek, Mehmet Furkan Akça RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi.2024; (39): 283. CrossRef
Universal skepticism of ChatGPT: a review of early literature on chat generative pre-trained transformer Casey Watters, Michal K. Lemanski Frontiers in Big Data.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
The importance of human supervision in the use of ChatGPT as a support tool in scientific writing William Castillo-González Metaverse Basic and Applied Research.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
ChatGPT for Future Medical and Dental Research Bader Fatani Cureus.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Chatbots in Medical Research Punit Sharma Clinical Nuclear Medicine.2023; 48(9): 838. CrossRef
Potential applications of ChatGPT in dermatology Nicolas Kluger Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
The emergent role of artificial intelligence, natural learning processing, and large language models in higher education and research Tariq Alqahtani, Hisham A. Badreldin, Mohammed Alrashed, Abdulrahman I. Alshaya, Sahar S. Alghamdi, Khalid bin Saleh, Shuroug A. Alowais, Omar A. Alshaya, Ishrat Rahman, Majed S. Al Yami, Abdulkareem M. Albekairy Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy.2023; 19(8): 1236. CrossRef
ChatGPT Performance on the American Urological Association Self-assessment Study Program and the Potential Influence of Artificial Intelligence in Urologic Training Nicholas A. Deebel, Ryan Terlecki Urology.2023; 177: 29. CrossRef
Intelligence or artificial intelligence? More hard problems for authors of Biological Psychology, the neurosciences, and everyone else Thomas Ritz Biological Psychology.2023; 181: 108590. CrossRef
The ethics of disclosing the use of artificial intelligence tools in writing scholarly manuscripts Mohammad Hosseini, David B Resnik, Kristi Holmes Research Ethics.2023; 19(4): 449. CrossRef
How trustworthy is ChatGPT? The case of bibliometric analyses Faiza Farhat, Shahab Saquib Sohail, Dag Øivind Madsen Cogent Engineering.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Disclosing use of Artificial Intelligence: Promoting transparency in publishing Parvaiz A. Koul Lung India.2023; 40(5): 401. CrossRef
ChatGPT in medical research: challenging time ahead Daideepya C Bhargava, Devendra Jadav, Vikas P Meshram, Tanuj Kanchan Medico-Legal Journal.2023; 91(4): 223. CrossRef
Academic publisher guidelines on AI usage: A ChatGPT supported thematic analysis Mike Perkins, Jasper Roe F1000Research.2023; 12: 1398. CrossRef
Ethical consideration of the use of generative artificial intelligence, including ChatGPT in writing a nursing article Sun Huh Child Health Nursing Research.2023; 29(4): 249. CrossRef
ChatGPT in medical writing: A game-changer or a gimmick? Shital Sarah Ahaley, Ankita Pandey, Simran Kaur Juneja, Tanvi Suhane Gupta, Sujatha Vijayakumar Perspectives in Clinical Research.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Artificial Intelligence-Supported Systems in Anesthesiology and Its Standpoint to Date—A Review Fiona M. P. Pham Open Journal of Anesthesiology.2023; 13(07): 140. CrossRef
ChatGPT as an innovative tool for increasing sales in online stores Michał Orzoł, Katarzyna Szopik-Depczyńska Procedia Computer Science.2023; 225: 3450. CrossRef
Intelligent Plagiarism as a Misconduct in Academic Integrity Jesús Miguel Muñoz-Cantero, Eva Maria Espiñeira-Bellón Acta Médica Portuguesa.2023; 37(1): 1. CrossRef
Follow-up of Artificial Intelligence Development and its Controlled Contribution to the Article: Step to the Authorship? Ekrem Solmaz European Journal of Therapeutics.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
May Artificial Intelligence Be a Co-Author on an Academic Paper? Ayşe Balat, İlhan Bahşi European Journal of Therapeutics.2023; 29(3): e12. CrossRef
Opportunities and challenges for ChatGPT and large language models in biomedicine and health Shubo Tian, Qiao Jin, Lana Yeganova, Po-Ting Lai, Qingqing Zhu, Xiuying Chen, Yifan Yang, Qingyu Chen, Won Kim, Donald C Comeau, Rezarta Islamaj, Aadit Kapoor, Xin Gao, Zhiyong Lu Briefings in Bioinformatics.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
ChatGPT: "To be or not to be" ... in academic research. The human mind's analytical rigor and capacity to discriminate between AI bots' truths and hallucinations Aurelian Anghelescu, Ilinca Ciobanu, Constantin Munteanu, Lucia Ana Maria Anghelescu, Gelu Onose Balneo and PRM Research Journal.2023; 14(Vol.14, no): 614. CrossRef
Editorial policies of Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions on the use of generative artificial intelligence in article writing and peer review Sun Huh Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2023; 20: 40. CrossRef
Should We Wait for Major Frauds to Unveil to Plan an AI Use License? Istemihan Coban European Journal of Therapeutics.2023; 30(2): 198. CrossRef
This study aimed to compare the knowledge and interpretation ability of ChatGPT, a language model of artificial general intelligence, with those of medical students in Korea by administering a parasitology examination to both ChatGPT and medical students. The examination consisted of 79 items and was administered to ChatGPT on January 1, 2023. The examination results were analyzed in terms of ChatGPT’s overall performance score, its correct answer rate by the items’ knowledge level, and the acceptability of its explanations of the items. ChatGPT’s performance was lower than that of the medical students, and ChatGPT’s correct answer rate was not related to the items’ knowledge level. However, there was a relationship between acceptable explanations and correct answers. In conclusion, ChatGPT’s knowledge and interpretation ability for this parasitology examination were not yet comparable to those of medical students in Korea.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Performance of ChatGPT on the India Undergraduate Community Medicine Examination: Cross-Sectional Study Aravind P Gandhi, Felista Karen Joesph, Vineeth Rajagopal, P Aparnavi, Sushma Katkuri, Sonal Dayama, Prakasini Satapathy, Mahalaqua Nazli Khatib, Shilpa Gaidhane, Quazi Syed Zahiruddin, Ashish Behera JMIR Formative Research.2024; 8: e49964. CrossRef
Large Language Models and Artificial Intelligence: A Primer for Plastic Surgeons on the Demonstrated and Potential Applications, Promises, and Limitations of ChatGPT Jad Abi-Rafeh, Hong Hao Xu, Roy Kazan, Ruth Tevlin, Heather Furnas Aesthetic Surgery Journal.2024; 44(3): 329. CrossRef
Unveiling the ChatGPT phenomenon: Evaluating the consistency and accuracy of endodontic question answers Ana Suárez, Víctor Díaz‐Flores García, Juan Algar, Margarita Gómez Sánchez, María Llorente de Pedro, Yolanda Freire International Endodontic Journal.2024; 57(1): 108. CrossRef
Bob or Bot: Exploring ChatGPT's Answers to University Computer Science Assessment Mike Richards, Kevin Waugh, Mark Slaymaker, Marian Petre, John Woodthorpe, Daniel Gooch ACM Transactions on Computing Education.2024; 24(1): 1. CrossRef
Evaluating ChatGPT as a self‐learning tool in medical biochemistry: A performance assessment in undergraduate medical university examination Krishna Mohan Surapaneni, Anusha Rajajagadeesan, Lakshmi Goudhaman, Shalini Lakshmanan, Saranya Sundaramoorthi, Dineshkumar Ravi, Kalaiselvi Rajendiran, Porchelvan Swaminathan Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education.2024; 52(2): 237. CrossRef
Examining the use of ChatGPT in public universities in Hong Kong: a case study of restricted access areas Michelle W. T. Cheng, Iris H. Y. YIM Discover Education.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Performance of ChatGPT on Ophthalmology-Related Questions Across Various Examination Levels: Observational Study Firas Haddad, Joanna S Saade JMIR Medical Education.2024; 10: e50842. CrossRef
A comparative vignette study: Evaluating the potential role of a generative AI model in enhancing clinical decision‐making in nursing Mor Saban, Ilana Dubovi Journal of Advanced Nursing.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Comparison of the Performance of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 With That of Medical Students on the Written German Medical Licensing Examination: Observational Study Annika Meyer, Janik Riese, Thomas Streichert JMIR Medical Education.2024; 10: e50965. CrossRef
From hype to insight: Exploring ChatGPT's early footprint in education via altmetrics and bibliometrics Lung‐Hsiang Wong, Hyejin Park, Chee‐Kit Looi Journal of Computer Assisted Learning.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
A scoping review of artificial intelligence in medical education: BEME Guide No. 84 Morris Gordon, Michelle Daniel, Aderonke Ajiboye, Hussein Uraiby, Nicole Y. Xu, Rangana Bartlett, Janice Hanson, Mary Haas, Maxwell Spadafore, Ciaran Grafton-Clarke, Rayhan Yousef Gasiea, Colin Michie, Janet Corral, Brian Kwan, Diana Dolmans, Satid Thamma Medical Teacher.2024; : 1. CrossRef
Üniversite Öğrencilerinin ChatGPT 3,5 Deneyimleri: Yapay Zekâyla Yazılmış Masal Varyantları Bilge GÖK, Fahri TEMİZYÜREK, Özlem BAŞ Korkut Ata Türkiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi.2024; (14): 1040. CrossRef
Tracking ChatGPT Research: Insights From the Literature and the Web Omar Mubin, Fady Alnajjar, Zouheir Trabelsi, Luqman Ali, Medha Mohan Ambali Parambil, Zhao Zou IEEE Access.2024; 12: 30518. CrossRef
Potential applications of ChatGPT in obstetrics and gynecology in Korea: a review article YooKyung Lee, So Yun Kim Obstetrics & Gynecology Science.2024; 67(2): 153. CrossRef
Application of generative language models to orthopaedic practice Jessica Caterson, Olivia Ambler, Nicholas Cereceda-Monteoliva, Matthew Horner, Andrew Jones, Arwel Tomos Poacher BMJ Open.2024; 14(3): e076484. CrossRef
Opportunities, challenges, and future directions of large language models, including ChatGPT in medical education: a systematic scoping review Xiaojun Xu, Yixiao Chen, Jing Miao Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2024; 21: 6. CrossRef
The advent of ChatGPT: Job Made Easy or Job Loss to Data Analysts Abiola Timothy Owolabi, Oluwaseyi Oluwadamilare Okunlola, Emmanuel Taiwo Adewuyi, Janet Iyabo Idowu, Olasunkanmi James Oladapo WSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTERS.2024; 23: 24. CrossRef
ChatGPT in dentomaxillofacial radiology education Hilal Peker Öztürk, Hakan Avsever, Buğra Şenel, Şükran Ayran, Mustafa Çağrı Peker, Hatice Seda Özgedik, Nurten Baysal Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine.2024; 7(2): 224. CrossRef
Performance of ChatGPT on the Korean National Examination for Dental Hygienists Soo-Myoung Bae, Hye-Rim Jeon, Gyoung-Nam Kim, Seon-Hui Kwak, Hyo-Jin Lee Journal of Dental Hygiene Science.2024; 24(1): 62. CrossRef
Medical knowledge of ChatGPT in public health, infectious diseases, COVID-19 pandemic, and vaccines: multiple choice questions examination based performance Sultan Ayoub Meo, Metib Alotaibi, Muhammad Zain Sultan Meo, Muhammad Omair Sultan Meo, Mashhood Hamid Frontiers in Public Health.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Unlock the potential for Saudi Arabian higher education: a systematic review of the benefits of ChatGPT Eman Faisal Frontiers in Education.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Applicability of ChatGPT in Assisting to Solve Higher Order Problems in Pathology Ranwir K Sinha, Asitava Deb Roy, Nikhil Kumar, Himel Mondal Cureus.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Issues in the 3rd year of the COVID-19 pandemic, including computer-based testing, study design, ChatGPT, journal metrics, and appreciation to reviewers Sun Huh Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2023; 20: 5. CrossRef
Emergence of the metaverse and ChatGPT in journal publishing after the COVID-19 pandemic Sun Huh Science Editing.2023; 10(1): 1. CrossRef
Assessing the Capability of ChatGPT in Answering First- and Second-Order Knowledge Questions on Microbiology as per Competency-Based Medical Education Curriculum Dipmala Das, Nikhil Kumar, Langamba Angom Longjam, Ranwir Sinha, Asitava Deb Roy, Himel Mondal, Pratima Gupta Cureus.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Evaluating ChatGPT's Ability to Solve Higher-Order Questions on the Competency-Based Medical Education Curriculum in Medical Biochemistry Arindam Ghosh, Aritri Bir Cureus.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Overview of Early ChatGPT’s Presence in Medical Literature: Insights From a Hybrid Literature Review by ChatGPT and Human Experts Omar Temsah, Samina A Khan, Yazan Chaiah, Abdulrahman Senjab, Khalid Alhasan, Amr Jamal, Fadi Aljamaan, Khalid H Malki, Rabih Halwani, Jaffar A Al-Tawfiq, Mohamad-Hani Temsah, Ayman Al-Eyadhy Cureus.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
ChatGPT for Future Medical and Dental Research Bader Fatani Cureus.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
ChatGPT in Dentistry: A Comprehensive Review Hind M Alhaidry, Bader Fatani, Jenan O Alrayes, Aljowhara M Almana, Nawaf K Alfhaed Cureus.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Can we trust AI chatbots’ answers about disease diagnosis and patient care? Sun Huh Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2023; 66(4): 218. CrossRef
Large Language Models in Medical Education: Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions Alaa Abd-alrazaq, Rawan AlSaad, Dari Alhuwail, Arfan Ahmed, Padraig Mark Healy, Syed Latifi, Sarah Aziz, Rafat Damseh, Sadam Alabed Alrazak, Javaid Sheikh JMIR Medical Education.2023; 9: e48291. CrossRef
Early applications of ChatGPT in medical practice, education and research Sam Sedaghat Clinical Medicine.2023; 23(3): 278. CrossRef
A Review of Research on Teaching and Learning Transformation under the Influence of ChatGPT Technology 璇 师 Advances in Education.2023; 13(05): 2617. CrossRef
Performance of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 on the Japanese Medical Licensing Examination: Comparison Study Soshi Takagi, Takashi Watari, Ayano Erabi, Kota Sakaguchi JMIR Medical Education.2023; 9: e48002. CrossRef
ChatGPT’s quiz skills in different otolaryngology subspecialties: an analysis of 2576 single-choice and multiple-choice board certification preparation questions Cosima C. Hoch, Barbara Wollenberg, Jan-Christoffer Lüers, Samuel Knoedler, Leonard Knoedler, Konstantin Frank, Sebastian Cotofana, Michael Alfertshofer European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.2023; 280(9): 4271. CrossRef
Analysing the Applicability of ChatGPT, Bard, and Bing to Generate Reasoning-Based Multiple-Choice Questions in Medical Physiology Mayank Agarwal, Priyanka Sharma, Ayan Goswami Cureus.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
The Intersection of ChatGPT, Clinical Medicine, and Medical Education Rebecca Shin-Yee Wong, Long Chiau Ming, Raja Affendi Raja Ali JMIR Medical Education.2023; 9: e47274. CrossRef
The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: ChatGPT Assessment for Anatomy Course Tarık TALAN, Yusuf KALINKARA Uluslararası Yönetim Bilişim Sistemleri ve Bilgisayar Bilimleri Dergisi.2023; 7(1): 33. CrossRef
Comparing ChatGPT’s ability to rate the degree of stereotypes and the consistency of stereotype attribution with those of medical students in New Zealand in developing a similarity rating test: a methodological study Chao-Cheng Lin, Zaine Akuhata-Huntington, Che-Wei Hsu Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2023; 20: 17. CrossRef
Assessing the Efficacy of ChatGPT in Solving Questions Based on the Core Concepts in Physiology Arijita Banerjee, Aquil Ahmad, Payal Bhalla, Kavita Goyal Cureus.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
ChatGPT Performs on the Chinese National Medical Licensing Examination Xinyi Wang, Zhenye Gong, Guoxin Wang, Jingdan Jia, Ying Xu, Jialu Zhao, Qingye Fan, Shaun Wu, Weiguo Hu, Xiaoyang Li Journal of Medical Systems.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Artificial intelligence and its impact on job opportunities among university students in North Lima, 2023 Doris Ruiz-Talavera, Jaime Enrique De la Cruz-Aguero, Nereo García-Palomino, Renzo Calderón-Espinoza, William Joel Marín-Rodriguez ICST Transactions on Scalable Information Systems.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Revolutionizing Dental Care: A Comprehensive Review of Artificial Intelligence Applications Among Various Dental Specialties Najd Alzaid, Omar Ghulam, Modhi Albani, Rafa Alharbi, Mayan Othman, Hasan Taher, Saleem Albaradie, Suhael Ahmed Cureus.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: Scoping Review Carl Preiksaitis, Christian Rose JMIR Medical Education.2023; 9: e48785. CrossRef
Exploring the impact of language models, such as ChatGPT, on student learning and assessment Araz Zirar Review of Education.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Evaluating the reliability of ChatGPT as a tool for imaging test referral: a comparative study with a clinical decision support system Shani Rosen, Mor Saban European Radiology.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Redesigning Tertiary Educational Evaluation with AI: A Task-Based Analysis of LIS Students’ Assessment on Written Tests and Utilizing ChatGPT at NSTU Shamima Yesmin Science & Technology Libraries.2023; : 1. CrossRef
ChatGPT and the AI revolution: a comprehensive investigation of its multidimensional impact and potential Mohd Afjal Library Hi Tech.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
The Significance of Artificial Intelligence Platforms in Anatomy Education: An Experience With ChatGPT and Google Bard Hasan B Ilgaz, Zehra Çelik Cureus.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Is ChatGPT’s Knowledge and Interpretative Ability Comparable to First Professional MBBS (Bachelor of Medicine, Bachelor of Surgery) Students of India in Taking a Medical Biochemistry Examination? Abhra Ghosh, Nandita Maini Jindal, Vikram K Gupta, Ekta Bansal, Navjot Kaur Bajwa, Abhishek Sett Cureus.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Ethical consideration of the use of generative artificial intelligence, including ChatGPT in writing a nursing article Sun Huh Child Health Nursing Research.2023; 29(4): 249. CrossRef
Potential Use of ChatGPT for Patient Information in Periodontology: A Descriptive Pilot Study Osman Babayiğit, Zeynep Tastan Eroglu, Dilek Ozkan Sen, Fatma Ucan Yarkac Cureus.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Efficacy and limitations of ChatGPT as a biostatistical problem-solving tool in medical education in Serbia: a descriptive study Aleksandra Ignjatović, Lazar Stevanović Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2023; 20: 28. CrossRef
Assessing the Performance of ChatGPT in Medical Biochemistry Using Clinical Case Vignettes: Observational Study Krishna Mohan Surapaneni JMIR Medical Education.2023; 9: e47191. CrossRef
A systematic review of ChatGPT use in K‐12 education Peng Zhang, Gemma Tur European Journal of Education.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Performance of ChatGPT, Bard, Claude, and Bing on the Peruvian National Licensing Medical Examination: a cross-sectional study Betzy Clariza Torres-Zegarra, Wagner Rios-Garcia, Alvaro Micael Ñaña-Cordova, Karen Fatima Arteaga-Cisneros, Xiomara Cristina Benavente Chalco, Marina Atena Bustamante Ordoñez, Carlos Jesus Gutierrez Rios, Carlos Alberto Ramos Godoy, Kristell Luisa Teresa Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2023; 20: 30. CrossRef
ChatGPT’s performance in German OB/GYN exams – paving the way for AI-enhanced medical education and clinical practice Maximilian Riedel, Katharina Kaefinger, Antonia Stuehrenberg, Viktoria Ritter, Niklas Amann, Anna Graf, Florian Recker, Evelyn Klein, Marion Kiechle, Fabian Riedel, Bastian Meyer Frontiers in Medicine.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Medical students’ patterns of using ChatGPT as a feedback tool and perceptions of ChatGPT in a Leadership and Communication course in Korea: a cross-sectional study Janghee Park Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2023; 20: 29. CrossRef
FROM TEXT TO DIAGNOSE: CHATGPT’S EFFICACY IN MEDICAL DECISION-MAKING Yaroslav Mykhalko, Pavlo Kish, Yelyzaveta Rubtsova, Oleksandr Kutsyn, Valentyna Koval Wiadomości Lekarskie.2023; 76(11): 2345. CrossRef
Using ChatGPT for Clinical Practice and Medical Education: Cross-Sectional Survey of Medical Students’ and Physicians’ Perceptions Pasin Tangadulrat, Supinya Sono, Boonsin Tangtrakulwanich JMIR Medical Education.2023; 9: e50658. CrossRef
Below average ChatGPT performance in medical microbiology exam compared to university students Malik Sallam, Khaled Al-Salahat Frontiers in Education.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
ChatGPT: "To be or not to be" ... in academic research. The human mind's analytical rigor and capacity to discriminate between AI bots' truths and hallucinations Aurelian Anghelescu, Ilinca Ciobanu, Constantin Munteanu, Lucia Ana Maria Anghelescu, Gelu Onose Balneo and PRM Research Journal.2023; 14(Vol.14, no): 614. CrossRef
ChatGPT Review: A Sophisticated Chatbot Models in Medical & Health-related Teaching and Learning Nur Izah Ab Razak, Muhammad Fawwaz Muhammad Yusoff, Rahmita Wirza O.K. Rahmat Malaysian Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences.2023; 19(s12): 98. CrossRef
Application of artificial intelligence chatbots, including ChatGPT, in education, scholarly work, programming, and content generation and its prospects: a narrative review Tae Won Kim Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2023; 20: 38. CrossRef
Trends in research on ChatGPT and adoption-related issues discussed in articles: a narrative review Sang-Jun Kim Science Editing.2023; 11(1): 3. CrossRef
Information amount, accuracy, and relevance of generative artificial intelligence platforms’ answers regarding learning objectives of medical arthropodology evaluated in English and Korean queries in December 2023: a descriptive study Hyunju Lee, Soobin Park Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2023; 20: 39. CrossRef
Artificial intelligence (AI) is expected to affect various fields of medicine substantially and has the potential to improve many aspects of healthcare. However, AI has been creating much hype, too. In applying AI technology to patients, medical professionals should be able to resolve any anxiety, confusion, and questions that patients and the public may have. Also, they are responsible for ensuring that AI becomes a technology beneficial for patient care. These make the acquisition of sound knowledge and experience about AI a task of high importance for medical students. Preparing for AI does not merely mean learning information technology such as computer programming. One should acquire sufficient knowledge of basic and clinical medicines, data science, biostatistics, and evidence-based medicine. As a medical student, one should not passively accept stories related to AI in medicine in the media and on the Internet. Medical students should try to develop abilities to distinguish correct information from hype and spin and even capabilities to create thoroughly validated, trustworthy information for patients and the public.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Radiology as a Specialty in the Era of Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis on Medical Students, Radiology Trainees, and Radiologists Amir Hassankhani, Melika Amoukhteh, Parya Valizadeh, Payam Jannatdoust, Paniz Sabeghi, Ali Gholamrezanezhad Academic Radiology.2024; 31(1): 306. CrossRef
Strategies for Implementing Machine Learning Algorithms in the Clinical Practice of Radiology Allison Chae, Michael S. Yao, Hersh Sagreiya, Ari D. Goldberg, Neil Chatterjee, Matthew T. MacLean, Jeffrey Duda, Ameena Elahi, Arijitt Borthakur, Marylyn D. Ritchie, Daniel Rader, Charles E. Kahn, Walter R. Witschey, James C. Gee Radiology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Towards integration of artificial intelligence into medical devices as a real-time recommender system for personalised healthcare: State-of-the-art and future prospects Talha Iqbal, Mehedi Masud, Bilal Amin, Conor Feely, Mary Faherty, Tim Jones, Michelle Tierney, Atif Shahzad, Patricia Vazquez Health Sciences Review.2024; 10: 100150. CrossRef
The Knowledge of Students at Bursa Faculty of Medicine towards Artificial Intelligence: A Survey Study Deniz GÜVEN, Elif Güler KAZANCI, Ayşe ÖREN, Livanur SEVER, Pelin ÜNLÜ Journal of Bursa Faculty of Medicine.2024; 2(1): 20. CrossRef
Preparing healthcare leaders of the digital age with an integrative artificial intelligence curriculum: a pilot study Soo Hwan Park, Roshini Pinto-Powell, Thomas Thesen, Alexander Lindqwister, Joshua Levy, Rachael Chacko, Devina Gonzalez, Connor Bridges, Adam Schwendt, Travis Byrum, Justin Fong, Shahin Shasavari, Saeed Hassanpour Medical Education Online.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
A scoping review of artificial intelligence in medical education: BEME Guide No. 84 Morris Gordon, Michelle Daniel, Aderonke Ajiboye, Hussein Uraiby, Nicole Y. Xu, Rangana Bartlett, Janice Hanson, Mary Haas, Maxwell Spadafore, Ciaran Grafton-Clarke, Rayhan Yousef Gasiea, Colin Michie, Janet Corral, Brian Kwan, Diana Dolmans, Satid Thamma Medical Teacher.2024; : 1. CrossRef
Artificial Intelligence Readiness Status of Medical Faculty Students Büşra EMİR, Tulin YURDEM, Tulin OZEL, Toygar SAYAR, Teoman Atalay UZUN, Umit AKAR, Unal Arda COLAK Konuralp Tıp Dergisi.2024; 16(1): 88. CrossRef
Potential applications of ChatGPT in obstetrics and gynecology in Korea: a review article YooKyung Lee, So Yun Kim Obstetrics & Gynecology Science.2024; 67(2): 153. CrossRef
ChatGPT in dentomaxillofacial radiology education Hilal Peker Öztürk, Hakan Avsever, Buğra Şenel, Şükran Ayran, Mustafa Çağrı Peker, Hatice Seda Özgedik, Nurten Baysal Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine.2024; 7(2): 224. CrossRef
Twelve tips for addressing ethical concerns in the implementation of artificial intelligence in medical education Russell Franco D’Souza, Mary Mathew, Vedprakash Mishra, Krishna Mohan Surapaneni Medical Education Online.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
A novel adaptive cubic quasi‐Newton optimizer for deep learning based medical image analysis tasks, validated on detection of COVID‐19 and segmentation for COVID‐19 lung infection, liver tumor, and optic disc/cup Yan Liu, Maojun Zhang, Zhiwei Zhong, Xiangrong Zeng Medical Physics.2023; 50(3): 1528. CrossRef
Clinical informatics training in medical school education curricula: a scoping review Humairah Zainal, Joshua Kuan Tan, Xin Xiaohui, Julian Thumboo, Fong Kok Yong Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association.2023; 30(3): 604. CrossRef
Are ChatGPT’s knowledge and interpretation ability comparable to those of medical students in Korea for taking a parasitology examination?: a descriptive study Sun Huh Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2023; 20: 1. CrossRef
Exploring the views of Singapore junior doctors on medical curricula for the digital age: A case study Humairah Zainal, Xin Xiaohui, Julian Thumboo, Fong Kok Yong, Conor Gilligan PLOS ONE.2023; 18(3): e0281108. CrossRef
Artificial Intelligence Teaching as Part of Medical Education: Qualitative Analysis of Expert Interviews Lukas Weidener, Michael Fischer JMIR Medical Education.2023; 9: e46428. CrossRef
Investigating Students’ Perceptions towards Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education Ali Jasem Buabbas, Brouj Miskin, Amar Ali Alnaqi, Adel K. Ayed, Abrar Abdulmohsen Shehab, Shabbir Syed-Abdul, Mohy Uddin Healthcare.2023; 11(9): 1298. CrossRef
Performance and risks of ChatGPT used in drug information: an exploratory real-world analysis Benedict Morath, Ute Chiriac, Elena Jaszkowski, Carolin Deiß, Hannah Nürnberg, Katrin Hörth, Torsten Hoppe-Tichy, Kim Green European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy.2023; : ejhpharm-2023-003750. CrossRef
A closer look at the current knowledge and prospects of artificial intelligence integration in dentistry practice: A cross-sectional study Zuhal Y. Hamd, Wiam Elshami, Sausan Al Kawas, Hanan Aljuaid, Mohamed M. Abuzaid Heliyon.2023; 9(6): e17089. CrossRef
ChatGPT and the Future of Digital Health: A Study on Healthcare Workers’ Perceptions and Expectations Mohamad-Hani Temsah, Fadi Aljamaan, Khalid H. Malki, Khalid Alhasan, Ibraheem Altamimi, Razan Aljarbou, Faisal Bazuhair, Abdulmajeed Alsubaihin, Naif Abdulmajeed, Fatimah S. Alshahrani, Reem Temsah, Turki Alshahrani, Lama Al-Eyadhy, Serin Mohammed Alkhate Healthcare.2023; 11(13): 1812. CrossRef
The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on the Preference of Radiology as a Future Specialty Among Medical Students at Jazan University, Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study Khalid M Hakami, Mohammed Alameer, Essa Jaawna, Abdulrahman Sudi, Bahiyyah Bahkali, Amnah Mohammed, Abdulaziz Hakami, Mohamed Salih Mahfouz, Abdulaziz H Alhazmi, Turki M Dhayihi Cureus.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Application of artificial intelligence in medical education: focus on the application of ChatGPT for clinical medical education Hyeonmi Hong, Youngjoon Kang, Youngjon Kim, Bomsol Kim Journal of Medicine and Life Science.2023; 20(2): 53. CrossRef
Medical Students’ Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence in Radiology:
The Current Understanding and Impact on Radiology as a Future
Specialty Choice Ali Alamer Current Medical Imaging Formerly Current Medical Imaging Reviews.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Psychometric properties of the persian version of the Medical Artificial Intelligence Readiness Scale for Medical Students (MAIRS-MS) AmirAli Moodi Ghalibaf, Maryam Moghadasin, Ali Emadzadeh, Haniye Mastour BMC Medical Education.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Views of Veterinary Faculty Students on the Concept of Artificial Intelligence and Its Use in Veterinary Medicine Practices: An Example of XXXX University Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Nigar YERLİKAYA, Özgül KÜÇÜKASLAN Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
A Pilot Remote Curriculum to Enhance Resident and Medical Student Understanding of Machine Learning in Healthcare Seth M. Meade, Sebastian Salas-Vega, Matthew R. Nagy, Swetha J. Sundar, Michael P. Steinmetz, Edward C. Benzel, Ghaith Habboub World Neurosurgery.2023; 180: e142. CrossRef
Medical Students’ Knowledge and Attitudes about Artificial Intelligence: A Cross-Sectional Survey Amber EKER, Ahmet Asım ÇALIŞKAN, Aysel ZORALİ, Bensu KAYNAK, Mehmet Erhan DERİN Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası.2023; 22(68): 41. CrossRef
El camino a futuro de la pediatría: Nuevas oportunidades con la inteligencia artificial en la atención infantil Wagner Rios-Garcia, Mayli M. Condori-Orosco, Cyntia J. Huasasquiche Investigación e Innovación Clínica y Quirúrgica Pediátrica.2023; 1(2): 71. CrossRef
Percepciones de estudiantes de Medicina sobre el impacto de la inteligencia artificial en radiología G. Caparrós Galán, F. Sendra Portero Radiología.2022; 64(6): 516. CrossRef
Finding the needle by modeling the haystack: Pulmonary embolism in an emergency patient with cardiorespiratory manifestations Davide Luciani, Alessandro Magrini, Carlo Berzuini, Antonello Gavazzi, Paolo Canova, Tiziano Barbui, Guido Bertolini Expert Systems with Applications.2022; 189: 116066. CrossRef
SHIFTing artificial intelligence to be responsible in healthcare: A systematic review Haytham Siala, Yichuan Wang Social Science & Medicine.2022; 296: 114782. CrossRef
AUGMENTING CBME CURRICULUM WITH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE COURSES – A FUTURISTIC APPROACH. Yogesh Bahurupi, Ashwini A Mahadule, Prashant M Patil, Vartika Saxena INDIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH.2022; : 46. CrossRef
Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Pathology: The Extinction of a Medical Profession or the Key to a Bright Future? Ananda van der Kamp, Tomas J. Waterlander, Thomas de Bel, Jeroen van der Laak, Marry M. van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Annelies M. C. Mavinkurve-Groothuis, Ronald R. de Krijger Pediatric and Developmental Pathology.2022; 25(4): 380. CrossRef
Artificial Intelligence Education for the Health Workforce: Expert Survey of Approaches and Needs Kathleen Gray, John Slavotinek, Gerardo Luis Dimaguila, Dawn Choo JMIR Medical Education.2022; 8(2): e35223. CrossRef
Advancements in Oncology with Artificial Intelligence—A Review Article Nikitha Vobugari, Vikranth Raja, Udhav Sethi, Kejal Gandhi, Kishore Raja, Salim R. Surani Cancers.2022; 14(5): 1349. CrossRef
Needs, Challenges, and Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education Curriculum Joel Grunhut, Oge Marques, Adam T M Wyatt JMIR Medical Education.2022; 8(2): e35587. CrossRef
Promoting Research, Awareness, and Discussion on AI in Medicine Using #MedTwitterAI: A Longitudinal Twitter Hashtag Analysis Faisal A. Nawaz, Austin A. Barr, Monali Y. Desai, Christos Tsagkaris, Romil Singh, Elisabeth Klager, Fabian Eibensteiner, Emil D. Parvanov, Mojca Hribersek, Maria Kletecka-Pulker, Harald Willschke, Atanas G. Atanasov Frontiers in Public Health.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Communication training for pharmacy students with standard patients using artificial intelligence Naoto Nakagawa, Keita Odanaka, Hiroshi Ohara, Shigeki Kisara Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning.2022; 14(7): 854. CrossRef
Artificial intelligence in healthcare: Should it be included in the medical curriculum? A students’ perspective MANISHI BANSAL, ANKUSH JINDAL The National Medical Journal of India.2022; 35: 56. CrossRef
Undergraduate Medical Students’ and Interns’ Knowledge and Perception of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Nisha Jha, Pathiyil Ravi Shankar, Mohammed Azmi Al-Betar, Rupesh Mukhia, Kabita Hada, Subish Palaian Advances in Medical Education and Practice.2022; Volume 13: 927. CrossRef
Perceptions of US Medical Students on Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Mixed Methods Survey Study David Shalom Liu, Jake Sawyer, Alexander Luna, Jihad Aoun, Janet Wang, Lord Boachie, Safwan Halabi, Bina Joe JMIR Medical Education.2022; 8(4): e38325. CrossRef
Artificial intelligence in medical education: a cross-sectional needs assessment M. Murat Civaner, Yeşim Uncu, Filiz Bulut, Esra Giounous Chalil, Abdülhamit Tatli BMC Medical Education.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Medical students’ perceptions of the impact of artificial intelligence in radiology G. Caparrós Galán, F. Sendra Portero Radiología (English Edition).2022; 64(6): 516. CrossRef
Medical Education 4.0: A Neurology Perspective Zaitoon Zafar, Muhammad Umair, Filzah Faheem, Danish Bhatti , Junaid S Kalia Cureus.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
AI in the hands of imperfect users Kristin M. Kostick-Quenet, Sara Gerke npj Digital Medicine.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Trust and medical AI: the challenges we face and the expertise needed to overcome them Thomas P Quinn, Manisha Senadeera, Stephan Jacobs, Simon Coghlan, Vuong Le Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association.2021; 28(4): 890. CrossRef
Attitude of Brazilian dentists and dental students regarding the future role of artificial intelligence in oral radiology: a multicenter survey Ruben Pauwels, Yumi Chokyu Del Rey Dentomaxillofacial Radiology.2021; 50(5): 20200461. CrossRef
Key Principles of Clinical Validation, Device Approval, and Insurance Coverage Decisions of Artificial Intelligence Seong Ho Park, Jaesoon Choi, Jeong-Sik Byeon Korean Journal of Radiology.2021; 22(3): 442. CrossRef
Basic of machine learning and deep learning in imaging for medical physicists Luigi Manco, Nicola Maffei, Silvia Strolin, Sara Vichi, Luca Bottazzi, Lidia Strigari Physica Medica.2021; 83: 194. CrossRef
Inteligencia artificial y simulación en urología J. Gómez Rivas, C. Toribio Vázquez, C. Ballesteros Ruiz, M. Taratkin, J.L. Marenco, G.E. Cacciamani, E. Checcucci, Z. Okhunov, D. Enikeev, F. Esperto, R. Grossmann, B. Somani, D. Veneziano Actas Urológicas Españolas.2021; 45(8): 524. CrossRef
Regulating AI in Health Care: The Challenges of Informed User Engagement Olya Kudina Hastings Center Report.2021; 51(5): 6. CrossRef
Are We Ready to Integrate Artificial Intelligence Literacy into Medical School Curriculum: Students and Faculty Survey Elena A Wood, Brittany L Ange, D Douglas Miller Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development.2021; 8: 238212052110240. CrossRef
A Conference-Friendly, Hands-on Introduction to Deep Learning for Radiology Trainees Walter F. Wiggins, M. Travis Caton, Kirti Magudia, Michael H. Rosenthal, Katherine P. Andriole Journal of Digital Imaging.2021; 34(4): 1026. CrossRef
Artificial intelligence and simulation in urology J. Gómez Rivas, C. Toribio Vázquez, C. Ballesteros Ruiz, M. Taratkin, J.L. Marenco, G.E. Cacciamani, E. Checcucci, Z. Okhunov, D. Enikeev, F. Esperto, R. Grossmann, B. Somani, D. Veneziano Actas Urológicas Españolas (English Edition).2021; 45(8): 524. CrossRef
Accelerating the Appropriate Adoption of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care: Protocol for a Multistepped Approach David Wiljer, Mohammad Salhia, Elham Dolatabadi, Azra Dhalla, Caitlin Gillan, Dalia Al-Mouaswas, Ethan Jackson, Jacqueline Waldorf, Jane Mattson, Megan Clare, Nadim Lalani, Rebecca Charow, Sarmini Balakumar, Sarah Younus, Tharshini Jeyakumar, Wanda Petean JMIR Research Protocols.2021; 10(10): e30940. CrossRef
Artificial Intelligence in Undergraduate Medical Education: A Scoping Review Juehea Lee, Annie Siyu Wu, David Li, Kulamakan (Mahan) Kulasegaram Academic Medicine.2021; 96(11S): S62. CrossRef
Artificial Intelligence Evidence-Based Current Status and Potential for Lower Limb Vascular Management Xenia Butova, Sergey Shayakhmetov, Maxim Fedin, Igor Zolotukhin, Sergio Gianesini Journal of Personalized Medicine.2021; 11(12): 1280. CrossRef
Artificial Intelligence Education Programs for Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review Rebecca Charow, Tharshini Jeyakumar, Sarah Younus, Elham Dolatabadi, Mohammad Salhia, Dalia Al-Mouaswas, Melanie Anderson, Sarmini Balakumar, Megan Clare, Azra Dhalla, Caitlin Gillan, Shabnam Haghzare, Ethan Jackson, Nadim Lalani, Jane Mattson, Wanda Pete JMIR Medical Education.2021; 7(4): e31043. CrossRef
The Journal Citation Indicator has arrived for Emerging Sources Citation Index journals, including the Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, in June 2021 Sun Huh Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2021; 18: 20. CrossRef
Ethical Challenges of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care: A Narrative Review Aaron T. Hui, Shawn S. Ahn, Carolyn T. Lye, Jun Deng Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine: An International Journal.2021; 12(1): 55. CrossRef
Bayesian networks: Making the most of a history Rami Abbass, Usmaan Bhatti, Shad Asinger The Clinical Teacher.2021; 18(2): 140. CrossRef
Fundamentals in Artificial Intelligence for Vascular Surgeons Juliette Raffort, Cédric Adam, Marion Carrier, Fabien Lareyre Annals of Vascular Surgery.2020; 65: 254. CrossRef
Extending capabilities of artificial intelligence for decision-making and healthcare education Mohd Javaid, Abid Haleem, IbrahimHaleem Khan, Raju Vaishya, Abhishek Vaish Apollo Medicine.2020; 17(1): 53. CrossRef
Artificial intelligence with multi-functional machine learning platform development for better healthcare and precision medicine Zeeshan Ahmed, Khalid Mohamed, Saman Zeeshan, XinQi Dong Database.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Artificial Intelligence Education and Tools for Medical and Health Informatics Students: Systematic Review A Hasan Sapci, H Aylin Sapci JMIR Medical Education.2020; 6(1): e19285. CrossRef
Evaluation of epidemiological lectures using peer instruction: focusing on the importance of ConcepTests Toshiharu Mitsuhashi PeerJ.2020; 8: e9640. CrossRef
Artificial Intelligence in Small Bowel Endoscopy: Current Perspectives and Future Directions Dinesh Meher, Mrinal Gogoi, Pankaj Bharali, Prajna Anirvan, Shivaram Prasad Singh Journal of Digestive Endoscopy.2020; 11(04): 245. CrossRef
Key principles of clinical validation, device approval, and insurance coverage decisions of artificial intelligence Seong Ho Park, Jaesoon Choi, Jeong-Sik Byeon Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2020; 63(11): 696. CrossRef
Artificial intelligence-based education assists medical students’ interpretation of hip fracture Chi-Tung Cheng, Chih-Chi Chen, Chih-Yuan Fu, Chung-Hsien Chaou, Yu-Tung Wu, Chih-Po Hsu, Chih-Chen Chang, I-Fang Chung, Chi-Hsun Hsieh, Ming-Ju Hsieh, Chien-Hung Liao Insights into Imaging.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Current Status and Future Direction of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Medical Education Jin Sup Jung Korean Medical Education Review.2020; 22(2): 99. CrossRef
Introducing Artificial Intelligence Training in Medical Education Ketan Paranjape, Michiel Schinkel, Rishi Nannan Panday, Josip Car, Prabath Nanayakkara JMIR Medical Education.2019; 5(2): e16048. CrossRef
Purpose Lack of confidence in suturing/ligature skills due to insufficient practice and assessments is common among novice Chinese medical interns. This study aimed to improve the skill acquisition of medical interns through a new intervention program.
Methods In addition to regular clinical training, expert-led or expert-led plus artificial intelligence (AI) system tutoring courses were implemented during the first 2 weeks of the surgical block. Interns could voluntarily join the regular (no additional tutoring), expert-led tutoring, or expert-led+AI tutoring groups freely. In the regular group, interns (n=25) did not receive additional tutoring. The expert-led group received 3-hour expert-led tutoring and in-training formative assessments after 2 practice sessions. After a similar expert-led course, the expert-led+AI group (n=23) practiced and assessed their skills on an AI system. Through a comparison with the internal standard, the system automatically recorded and evaluated every intern’s suturing/ligature skills. In the expert-led+AI group, performance and confidence were compared between interns who participated in 1, 2, or 3 AI practice sessions.
Results The end-of-surgical block objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) performance and self-assessed confidence in suturing/ligature skills were highest in the expert-led+AI group. In comparison with the expert-led group, the expert-led+AI group showed similar performance in the in-training assessment and greater improvement in the end-of-surgical block OSCE. In the expert-led+AI group, the best performance and highest post-OSCE confidence were noted in those who engaged in 3 AI practice sessions.
Conclusion This pilot study demonstrated the potential value of incorporating an additional expert-led+AI system–assisted tutoring course into the regular surgical curriculum.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Automated measurement extraction for assessing simple suture quality in medical education Thanapon Noraset, Prawej Mahawithitwong, Wethit Dumronggittigule, Pongthep Pisarnturakit, Cherdsak Iramaneerat, Chanean Ruansetakit, Irin Chaikangwan, Nattanit Poungjantaradej, Nutcha Yodrabum Expert Systems with Applications.2024; 241: 122722. CrossRef
Dental student application of artificial intelligence technology in detecting proximal caries lesions Enes Ayan, Yusuf Bayraktar, Çiğdem Çelik, Baturalp Ayhan Journal of Dental Education.2024; 88(4): 490. CrossRef
Development of Artificial Intelligence–Teaching Assistant System for Undergraduate Nursing Students Yanika Kowitlawakul, Jocelyn Jie Min Tan, Siriwan Suebnukarn, Hoang D. Nguyen, Danny Chiang Choon Poo, Joseph Chai, Devi M. Kamala, Wenru Wang CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: A Systematic Review Atinc Tozsin, Harun Ucmak, Selim Soyturk, Abdullatif Aydin, Ali Serdar Gozen, Maha Al Fahim, Selcuk Güven, Kamran Ahmed Surgical Innovation.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Systematic literature review on opportunities, challenges, and future research recommendations of artificial intelligence in education Thomas K.F. Chiu, Qi Xia, Xinyan Zhou, Ching Sing Chai, Miaoting Cheng Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence.2023; 4: 100118. CrossRef
The impact of Generative AI (GenAI) on practices, policies and research direction in education: a case of ChatGPT and Midjourney Thomas K. F. Chiu Interactive Learning Environments.2023; : 1. CrossRef
Application value of an artificial intelligence-based diagnosis and recognition system in gastroscopy training for graduate students in gastroenterology: a preliminary study Peng An, Zhongqiu Wang Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Technological advancements in surgical laparoscopy considering artificial intelligence: a survey among surgeons in Germany Sebastian Lünse, Eric L. Wisotzky, Sophie Beckmann, Christoph Paasch, Richard Hunger, René Mantke Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Artificial intelligence (AI) integration in medical education: A pan-India cross-sectional observation of acceptance and understanding among students Vipul Sharma, Uddhave Saini, Varun Pareek, Lokendra Sharma, Susheel Kumar Scripta Medica.2023; 54(4): 343. CrossRef
Artificial Intelligence Methods and Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Metrics for Surgical Education: A Multidisciplinary Consensus S Swaroop Vedula, Ahmed Ghazi, Justin W Collins, Carla Pugh, Dimitrios Stefanidis, Ozanan Meireles, Andrew J Hung, Steven Schwaitzberg, Jeffrey S Levy, Ajit K Sachdeva Journal of the American College of Surgeons.2022; 234(6): 1181. CrossRef
The use and future perspective of Artificial Intelligence—A survey among German surgeons Mathieu Pecqueux, Carina Riediger, Marius Distler, Florian Oehme, Ulrich Bork, Fiona R. Kolbinger, Oliver Schöffski, Peter van Wijngaarden, Jürgen Weitz, Johannes Schweipert, Christoph Kahlert Frontiers in Public Health.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
TIPTA YAPAY ZEKA UYGULAMALARI Hatice KELEŞ Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi.2022; 24(3): 604. CrossRef
Application of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: An Overview Peng-ran Liu, Lin Lu, Jia-yao Zhang, Tong-tong Huo, Song-xiang Liu, Zhe-wei Ye Current Medical Science.2021; 41(6): 1105. CrossRef
Applications and Effects of EdTech in Medical Education Hyeonmi Hong, Youngjon Kim Korean Medical Education Review.2021; 23(3): 160. CrossRef
Artificial Intelligence Education and Tools for Medical and Health Informatics Students: Systematic Review A Hasan Sapci, H Aylin Sapci JMIR Medical Education.2020; 6(1): e19285. CrossRef
Scientific Development of Educational Artificial Intelligence in Web of Science Antonio-José Moreno-Guerrero, Jesús López-Belmonte, José-Antonio Marín-Marín, Rebeca Soler-Costa Future Internet.2020; 12(8): 124. CrossRef
An Educational Network for Surgical Education Supported by Gamification Elements: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial Natasha Guérard-Poirier, Michèle Beniey, Léamarie Meloche-Dumas, Florence Lebel-Guay, Bojana Misheva, Myriam Abbas, Malek Dhane, Myriam Elraheb, Adam Dubrowski, Erica Patocskai JMIR Research Protocols.2020; 9(12): e21273. CrossRef