Revision of subjects of the Korean Optometrist Licensing Examination suggested by optometrists

Won Jin Lee; Sung Soo Kang; Ok-Jin Lee; Sang-Chul Park; Seung-Won Lee; Young-Ki Jeon

doi:10.3352/jeehp.2012.9.5

Articles

Page Path: HOME > J Educ Eval Health Prof > Volume 9; 2012 > Article

Opinion Revision of subjects of the Korean Optometrist Licensing Examination suggested by optometrists: Won Jin Lee^1*, Sung Soo Kang¹, Ok-Jin Lee², Sang-Chul Park³, Seung-Won Lee², Young-Ki Jeon⁴; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2012.9.5
Published online: March 14, 2012

¹Department of Ophthalmic Optics, Daegu Polytechnic College, Daegu;

²Department of Optometry and Vision Science, Dongnam Health College, Suwon;

³Department of Ophthalmic Optics, Busan College of Information Technology, Busan;

⁴Department of Ophthalmic Optics, Kundong University, Andong, Korea

*Corresponding email: leewj@dpu.ac.kr

• Received: November 3, 2011 • Accepted: February 29, 2012

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

prev next

28,456 Views
148 Download
1 Crossref

Full Article

Download PDF

Acknowledgments
References

Since the introduction of the optometrist licensing system to the medical technician law in 1987, the first Korean Optometrist Licensing Examination was carried out on October 22, 1989. After that, there have been a variety of environmental changes. An optometry major was newly created in a number of colleges. There was a change of curriculum from a 2-year program to a 3-year program, and eventually to a 4-year one. As a result, a profound approach to subject revision of the Korean Optometrist Licensing Examination became necessary from the perspective of optometrist manpower and its management system.

Before these changes, the Korean Optometrist Licensing Examination consisted of four written examination categories: optometry, ophthalmic optics, ophthalmology, and medical health law. There was another separate performance examination. The detailed subjects covered by the written examination were as follows: ophthalmic optics, geometric optics, physical optics, ophthalmic optics instruments, prescribing and dispensing of eyeglasses, introduction to eyeglasses, glasses materials, ophthalmic anatomy, ophthalmic physiology, ophthalmic diseases, and abnormal ophthalmic function.

The improvements to the Korean Optometrist Licensing Examination were focused on specific subjects and items. In 1988 we published the results of a job analysis through a questionnaire survey on the optometrist’s job from 813 optometrists and 89 ophthalmic optic professors. It showed that optometric dispensing was the most important among their essential tasks and educational needs. Meanwhile, medical health law and business management was ranked least important out of six duty categories of optometrists, specifically, preliminary examination for visual acuity, visual test and refraction, prescription, optometric dispensing, follow-up, and medical health law and management [1]. After the analysis of the survey results, the findings were opened to be discussed by optometry professionals. The consensus of opinions from public hearings and workshops with ophthalmic optics professors were reflected in the suggestion of subjects. Revision of the subjects of the Korean Optometrist Licensing Examination was suggested as follows:

First, the examination subject entitled ‘introduction to eyeglasses’ should be removed and the corresponding contents included in other specific subjects. Second, content on contact lens included in ‘glasses materials’ should be allocated to a new subject entitled ‘eyesight correction materials’ composed of the subsections ‘contact lens materials’ and ‘glasses frame and lens materials’. Third, the subject ‘optometry’ containing refraction examination and stereovision function tests should be added and be emphasized.

Some of these changes are still under consideration by the National Health Licensing Examination Board of Korea. Further discussion is also necessary for the revision of the performance test after considering the availability of space and instruments in each college as well as the building of the National Health Licensing Examination Board.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a research grant from the National Health Personnel Licensing Examination Board, Republic of Korea, 2007–2008 (RE3-0810-16).

This article is available from: http://jeehp.org/

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

References

1. Lee OJ, Park SC, Lee SW, Jeon YK, Kang SS, Lee WJ. The importance of work capability and the educational needs for optometric duty. J Korean Ophthalmic Opt Soc 2009;14(4):27-31.

Figure & Data

References

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Can a medical regulatory system be implemented in Korea?
Sun Huh, Myung-Hyun Chung
Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2013; 56(3): 158. CrossRef

PubReader
ePub Link
Cite

CITE

export Copy Format

Close

XML Download

Related articles

Revision of subjects of the Korean Optometrist Licensing Examination suggested by optometrists