Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

JEEHP : Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Articles

Page Path
HOME > J Educ Eval Health Prof > Volume 21; 2024 > Article
Correspondence
Item difficulty index, discrimination index, and reliability of the 26 health professions licensing examinations in 2023, Korea: a psychometric study
Yoon Hee Kim*orcid, Bo Hyun Kimorcid, Joonki Kimorcid, Bokyoung Jungorcid, Sangyoung Baeorcid

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2024.21.40
Published online: December 11, 2024

Research and Development Division, Korea Health Personnel Licensing Examination Institute, Seoul, Korea

*Corresponding email: yhkim@kuksiwon.or.kr

Editor: A Ra Cho, The Catholic University of Korea, Korea

• Received: November 28, 2024   • Accepted: December 5, 2024

© 2024 Korea Health Personnel Licensing Examination Institute

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

prev next
  • 265 Views
  • 59 Download
The Korea Health Personnel Licensing Examination Institute conducts annual national licensing examinations to assess whether candidates possess the minimum competencies required for healthcare practice. Post-examination analyses of item difficulty, discrimination, and reliability are necessary to ensure the validity and appropriateness of these tests. Items with excessively high or low difficulty or discrimination indices may need review and revision, offering valuable feedback to improve future examinations.
This study analyzed the item difficulty, discrimination, and reliability of the 26 health personnel licensing examinations in Korea conducted in 2023 to evaluate their appropriateness. Additionally, it examined the correlation between the average item difficulty index and the average item discrimination index. It is a follow-up report from the 2022 licensing examinations [1].
This was not a human population study, but an analysis of test results. Therefore, institutional review board approval and informed consent were not required.
Item analysis was conducted for the 26 licensing examinations using classical test theory. Item difficulty (P) was calculated as the proportion of examinees selecting the correct answer, ranging from 0 to 1. Item discrimination was assessed through the upper and lower 27% rule, measuring the difference in difficulty between the top 27% and bottom 27% of examinees and the correlation coefficient between the item score and the total test score. The discrimination indices and reliability were calculated only for tests with more than 100 examinees. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS ver. 21.0 (IBM Corp.).
Pass rates for the 26 examinations varied widely, from 55.2% to 100%. The number of examinees ranged from 6 (health educators–level 1) to 339,417 (care workers). Examinations for physicians, dentists, midwives, nurses, doctors of Korean medicine, and pharmacists had pass rates above 90%. Of note, the midwives’ examination had a 100% pass rate, although only 8 candidates participated (Table 1).
The results of the item analysis for the 2023 examinations are summarized in Table 2.
All examinations demonstrated high reliability, with the lowest reliability observed (0.855) for the health educator (level 3) examination. The average difficulty indices ranged between 62.2% (health educators–level 2) and 81.3% (nurses), while the average item-total correlation spanned from 0.17 (doctors of Korean medicine) to 0.40 (medical technologists and opticians). A negative correlation was observed between the average difficulty index and the average discrimination index (r=–0.3910, P=0.0395), indicating that easier items were less effective at discriminating between high and low performers.
According to classical test theory, average difficulty indices are categorized as moderate (50%–60%), somewhat easy (60%–70%), easy (70%–80%), and very easy (80% or higher). Based on these criteria, the difficulty indices of the 2023 examinations were classified as very easy (nurses and physicians), easy (18 exams), and somewhat easy (10 exams). For medical professionals such as physicians (average difficulty index 80.9%), dentists (77.0%), nurses (81.3%), and doctors of Korean medicine (77.9%), the difficulty indices were in the very easy or easy categories, with pass rates exceeding 90%.
Discrimination indices were interpreted as low (<0.25), average (0.25–0.30), and good (>0.30). Eight examinations showed low discrimination, 9 had average discrimination, and 11 showed good discrimination. For example, the doctors of Korean medicine examination had a low discrimination index (average item-total correlation of 0.17), whereas the optician’s examination showed good discrimination (average item-total correlation of 0.40). All tests demonstrated high reliability, with Cronbach’s α values of 0.855 or higher, ensuring consistent assessment across the examinations.
In 2022, the national licensing examinations had 468,352 examinees with an 89.4% pass rate. In 2023, there were decreases in both examinees (446,054) and passers (388,067), yielding an 87.0% pass rate. The pass rate range shifted from 29.7%–97.1% in 2022 to 52.2%–100% in 2023. An analysis of difficulty indices for both years revealed that most examinations were relatively easy. Thirteen examinations in 2023 exhibited decreased difficulty indices compared to 2022, primarily transitioning among the “easy,” “very easy,” and “somewhat easy” categories, without significant overall shifts. Additionally, the Care Workers Qualification Examination’s transition to computer-based testing in 2023 resulted in non-disclosure of test items and analysis results, limiting direct comparisons.
For discrimination indices, 23 examinations showed lower indices in 2023, and 17 exhibited decreased item-total correlation coefficients. Despite these declines, the overall discrimination indices for the 2023 examinations did not significantly differ from 2022, suggesting no substantial reduction in discriminative power. Confidentiality policies limit the disclosure of detailed item analyses and test results, hindering comparisons with previous analyses and restricting academic discussions on these examinations.
In conclusion, Korea’s 2023 national health personnel licensing examinations demonstrated acceptable ranges of difficulty, discrimination, and reliability indices. However, 8 out of 28 examinations showed low discrimination indices despite appropriate difficulty levels.

Authors’ contributions

Conceptualization: YHK. Data curation: YHK. Methodology/formal analysis/validation: YHK. BHK, JK, BJ, SB. Project administration: YHK. Funding acquisition: none. Writing–original draft: YHK. Writing–review & editing: YHK. BHK, JK, BJ, SB.

Conflict of interest

All authors are employees of the Korea Health Personnel Licensing Examination Institute. However, they were not involved in the peer review or decision process. Otherwise, no potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Funding

None.

Data availability

The raw data are unavailable due to the Korea Health Personnel Licensing Examination Institute’s policy. For a more detailed analysis, please contact the corresponding author. Some data are available at http://www.kuksiwon.or.kr/notice/brd/m_51/list.do.

Acknowledgments

None.

Not applicable.
Table 1.
Pass rates for examinees in the 26 national health professions licensing examinations in Korea, 2023
Job titles No. of examinees No. of successful candidates Pass rate (%)
Assistive technology professionals (5th) 330 278 84.2
Care workersa) 339,417 299,556 88.3
Dental hygienists (51st) 5,243 4,613 88.0
Dental technicians (51st) 950 787 82.8
Dentists (76th) 794 753 94.8
Dietitians (47th) 5,559 4,032 72.5
Emergency medical technicians–level 1 (29th) 1,594 1,340 84.1
Emergency medical technicians–level 2 (29th) 1,100 896 81.5
Health educators–level 1 (14th) 6 4 66.7
Health educators–level 2 (14th) 131 78 59.5
Health educators–level 3 (14th) 1,009 716 71.0
Health information managers (40th) 2,409 1,588 65.9
Oriental medicine pharmacists (23rd) 154 134 87.0
Medical technologist (51st) 2,958 2,544 86.0
Midwives (34th) 8 8 100.0
Nurses (63rd) 24,015 23,359 97.3
Nursing aides (1st half) 16,156 13,583 84.1
Nursing aides (2nd half) 15,305 12,112 79.1
Occupational therapists (51st) 2,162 1,939 89.7
Opticians (36th) 1,451 977 67.3
Oriental medicine doctors (Doctor of Korean Medicine) (78th) 823 811 98.5
Oriental medicine dispenser (30th) - -
Pharmacists (74th) 2,014 1,887 93.7
Physical therapists (51st) 5,138 4,209 81.9
Physicians (87th) 3,358 3,181 94.7
Prosthetists and orthotists (24th) 115 90 78.3
Radiological technologists (51st) 2,738 2,118 77.4
Rehabilitation counselors–level 1 (7th) 532 462 86.8
Rehabilitation counselors–level 2 (7th) 140 122 87.1
Sanitary technician (45th) 7,685 4,013 52.2
Speech-language pathologists–level 1 (12th) 1,115 710 63.7
Speech-language pathologists–level 2 (12th) 1,645 1,167 70.9

a) In 2023, the Care Workers Qualification Examination transitioned to a computer-based test with continuous availability. For that year only, paper-based testing was conducted concurrently.

Table 2.
Difficulty index, upper and lower group discrimination index, item-total correlation, and reliability index (Cronbach α) of the 26 health professionals licensing examinations in Korea, 2023
Job title No. of subjects No. of items Difficulty index (%) Upper and lower group discriminationa) Item-total correlationa) Reliability (Cronbach α)
Assistive technology professional(5th) 2 170 68.2±24.7 0.20±0.14 0.21±0.11 0.876
Care workersb) 2 80
Dental hygienists (51st) 2 200 76.5±15.8 0.26±0.13 0.29±0.12 0.947
Dental technicians (51st) 3 205 74.5±17.5 0.31±0.13 0.34±0.10 0.963
Dentists (75th) 13 364 77.0±22.1 0.18±0.13 0.20±0.10 0.929
Dietitians (47th) 4 220 67.8±20.0 0.33±0.16 0.30±0.13 0.957
Emergency medical technicians–level 1 (29th) 5 230 70.2±18.9 0.27±0.13 0.26±0.10 0.946
Emergency medical technicians–level 2 (29th) 5 140 68.8±21.4 0.24±0.13 0.24±0.09 0.901
Health educators–level 1 (14th) 3 60 64.2±29.5 - - -
Health educators–level 2 (14th) 8 180 62.2±23.0 0.27±0.19 0.25±0.15 0.921
Health educators–level 3 (14th) 4 110 66.5±19.9 0.28±0.14 0.27±0.11 0.855
Health information managers (40th) 3 230 67.6±19.2 0.36±0.17 0.34±0.12 0.968
Medical technologists (51st) 4 280 77.8±16.5 0.34±0.15 0.40±.12 0.980
Midwives (34th) 4 165 74.2±23.8 - - -
Nurses (63rd) 8 295 81.3±19.5 0.18±0.13 0.24±0.10 0.940
Nursing aides (1st half) 4 100 78.2±17.1 0.34±0.19 0.38±0.13 0.941
Nursing aides (2nd half) 4 100 73.2±20.8 0.33±0.17 0.36±0.13 0.930
Occupational therapists (51st) 4 240 76.8±18.7 0.26±0.15 0.28±0.11 0.954
Opticians (36th) 4 250 69.0±17.3 0.42±0.15 0.40±0.12 0.979
Oriental medicine doctors (Doctor of Korean Medicine) (78th) 11 340 77.9±21.0 0.15±0.11 0.17±0.10 0.911
Oriental medicine pharmacist (24th) 3 250 72.5±21.1 0.27±0.14 0.30±0.15 0.958
Pharmacists (74th) 4 350 73.5±21.6 0.20±0.11 0.25±0.11 0.954
Physical therapists (51st) 5 260 72.0±19.6 0.29±0.13 0.31±0.12 0.963
Physicians (87th) 3 320K 80.9±19.7 0.17±0.13 0.23±0.10 0.941
Prosthetists and orthotists (24th) 7 210 70.3±18.2 0.31±0.18 0.29±0.14 0.952
Radiological technologists (51st) 4 250 71.7±18.7 0.35±0.15 0.33±0.11 0.972
Rehabilitation counselors–level 1 (7th) 7 150 c) 72.5±20.5 0.24±0.16 0.27±0.11 0.916
Rehabilitation counselors–level 2 (7th) 7 120 d) 74.4±20.4 0.28±0.15 0.33±0.12 0.919
Sanitary technicians (45th) 6 220 62.3±21.4 0.33±0.16 0.30±0.13 0.957
Speech-language pathologists–level 1 (12th) 6 140 64.9±21.3 0.28±0.16 0.24±0.12 0.907
Speech-language pathologists–level 2 (12th) 5 150 72.5±20.5 0.36±0.14 0.33±0.12 0.950

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation unless otherwise stated.

a) Discrimination indices and reliability were not calculated for examinations with fewer than 100 candidates.

b) The item analysis results for the Care Workers Qualification Examination are not disclosed.

c) In 2023, the number of test items for rehabilitation counselors (level 1, 7th) was adjusted from 120 to 150.

d) In 2023, the number of test items for rehabilitation counselors (level 2, 7th) was adjusted from 150 to 120.

  • 1. Kim YH, Kim BH, Kim J, Jung B, Bae S. Item difficulty index, discrimination index, and reliability of the 26 health professions licensing examinations in 2023, Korea: a psychometric study. J Educ Eval Health Prof 2024;21:40. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2024.21.40 ArticlePubMedPMC

Figure & Data

References

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  

      Related articles
      Item difficulty index, discrimination index, and reliability of the 26 health professions licensing examinations in 2023, Korea: a psychometric study
      Item difficulty index, discrimination index, and reliability of the 26 health professions licensing examinations in 2023, Korea: a psychometric study
      Job titles No. of examinees No. of successful candidates Pass rate (%)
      Assistive technology professionals (5th) 330 278 84.2
      Care workersa) 339,417 299,556 88.3
      Dental hygienists (51st) 5,243 4,613 88.0
      Dental technicians (51st) 950 787 82.8
      Dentists (76th) 794 753 94.8
      Dietitians (47th) 5,559 4,032 72.5
      Emergency medical technicians–level 1 (29th) 1,594 1,340 84.1
      Emergency medical technicians–level 2 (29th) 1,100 896 81.5
      Health educators–level 1 (14th) 6 4 66.7
      Health educators–level 2 (14th) 131 78 59.5
      Health educators–level 3 (14th) 1,009 716 71.0
      Health information managers (40th) 2,409 1,588 65.9
      Oriental medicine pharmacists (23rd) 154 134 87.0
      Medical technologist (51st) 2,958 2,544 86.0
      Midwives (34th) 8 8 100.0
      Nurses (63rd) 24,015 23,359 97.3
      Nursing aides (1st half) 16,156 13,583 84.1
      Nursing aides (2nd half) 15,305 12,112 79.1
      Occupational therapists (51st) 2,162 1,939 89.7
      Opticians (36th) 1,451 977 67.3
      Oriental medicine doctors (Doctor of Korean Medicine) (78th) 823 811 98.5
      Oriental medicine dispenser (30th) - -
      Pharmacists (74th) 2,014 1,887 93.7
      Physical therapists (51st) 5,138 4,209 81.9
      Physicians (87th) 3,358 3,181 94.7
      Prosthetists and orthotists (24th) 115 90 78.3
      Radiological technologists (51st) 2,738 2,118 77.4
      Rehabilitation counselors–level 1 (7th) 532 462 86.8
      Rehabilitation counselors–level 2 (7th) 140 122 87.1
      Sanitary technician (45th) 7,685 4,013 52.2
      Speech-language pathologists–level 1 (12th) 1,115 710 63.7
      Speech-language pathologists–level 2 (12th) 1,645 1,167 70.9
      Job title No. of subjects No. of items Difficulty index (%) Upper and lower group discriminationa) Item-total correlationa) Reliability (Cronbach α)
      Assistive technology professional(5th) 2 170 68.2±24.7 0.20±0.14 0.21±0.11 0.876
      Care workersb) 2 80
      Dental hygienists (51st) 2 200 76.5±15.8 0.26±0.13 0.29±0.12 0.947
      Dental technicians (51st) 3 205 74.5±17.5 0.31±0.13 0.34±0.10 0.963
      Dentists (75th) 13 364 77.0±22.1 0.18±0.13 0.20±0.10 0.929
      Dietitians (47th) 4 220 67.8±20.0 0.33±0.16 0.30±0.13 0.957
      Emergency medical technicians–level 1 (29th) 5 230 70.2±18.9 0.27±0.13 0.26±0.10 0.946
      Emergency medical technicians–level 2 (29th) 5 140 68.8±21.4 0.24±0.13 0.24±0.09 0.901
      Health educators–level 1 (14th) 3 60 64.2±29.5 - - -
      Health educators–level 2 (14th) 8 180 62.2±23.0 0.27±0.19 0.25±0.15 0.921
      Health educators–level 3 (14th) 4 110 66.5±19.9 0.28±0.14 0.27±0.11 0.855
      Health information managers (40th) 3 230 67.6±19.2 0.36±0.17 0.34±0.12 0.968
      Medical technologists (51st) 4 280 77.8±16.5 0.34±0.15 0.40±.12 0.980
      Midwives (34th) 4 165 74.2±23.8 - - -
      Nurses (63rd) 8 295 81.3±19.5 0.18±0.13 0.24±0.10 0.940
      Nursing aides (1st half) 4 100 78.2±17.1 0.34±0.19 0.38±0.13 0.941
      Nursing aides (2nd half) 4 100 73.2±20.8 0.33±0.17 0.36±0.13 0.930
      Occupational therapists (51st) 4 240 76.8±18.7 0.26±0.15 0.28±0.11 0.954
      Opticians (36th) 4 250 69.0±17.3 0.42±0.15 0.40±0.12 0.979
      Oriental medicine doctors (Doctor of Korean Medicine) (78th) 11 340 77.9±21.0 0.15±0.11 0.17±0.10 0.911
      Oriental medicine pharmacist (24th) 3 250 72.5±21.1 0.27±0.14 0.30±0.15 0.958
      Pharmacists (74th) 4 350 73.5±21.6 0.20±0.11 0.25±0.11 0.954
      Physical therapists (51st) 5 260 72.0±19.6 0.29±0.13 0.31±0.12 0.963
      Physicians (87th) 3 320K 80.9±19.7 0.17±0.13 0.23±0.10 0.941
      Prosthetists and orthotists (24th) 7 210 70.3±18.2 0.31±0.18 0.29±0.14 0.952
      Radiological technologists (51st) 4 250 71.7±18.7 0.35±0.15 0.33±0.11 0.972
      Rehabilitation counselors–level 1 (7th) 7 150 c) 72.5±20.5 0.24±0.16 0.27±0.11 0.916
      Rehabilitation counselors–level 2 (7th) 7 120 d) 74.4±20.4 0.28±0.15 0.33±0.12 0.919
      Sanitary technicians (45th) 6 220 62.3±21.4 0.33±0.16 0.30±0.13 0.957
      Speech-language pathologists–level 1 (12th) 6 140 64.9±21.3 0.28±0.16 0.24±0.12 0.907
      Speech-language pathologists–level 2 (12th) 5 150 72.5±20.5 0.36±0.14 0.33±0.12 0.950
      Table 1. Pass rates for examinees in the 26 national health professions licensing examinations in Korea, 2023

      In 2023, the Care Workers Qualification Examination transitioned to a computer-based test with continuous availability. For that year only, paper-based testing was conducted concurrently.

      Table 2. Difficulty index, upper and lower group discrimination index, item-total correlation, and reliability index (Cronbach α) of the 26 health professionals licensing examinations in Korea, 2023

      Values are presented as mean±standard deviation unless otherwise stated.

      Discrimination indices and reliability were not calculated for examinations with fewer than 100 candidates.

      The item analysis results for the Care Workers Qualification Examination are not disclosed.

      In 2023, the number of test items for rehabilitation counselors (level 1, 7th) was adjusted from 120 to 150.

      In 2023, the number of test items for rehabilitation counselors (level 2, 7th) was adjusted from 150 to 120.


      JEEHP : Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions
      TOP