Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

JEEHP : Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions



Page Path
HOME > J Educ Eval Health Prof > Volume 17; 2020 > Article
Brief report
Impact of multi-professional simulation-based training on perceptions of safety and preparedness among health workers caring for coronavirus disease 2019 patients in Pakistan
Jamal Azfar Khan1*orcid, Muhammad Rizwan Bashir Kiani2orcid

Published online: June 29, 2020
  • 207 Download
  • 11 Crossref
  • 10 Scopus

1Department of Internal Medicine, Combined Military Hospital Landi Kotal Cantt, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan

2Army Medical College, Rawalpindi, Pakistan

*Corresponding email:

Editor: Sun Huh, Hallym University, Korea

• Received: May 11, 2020   • Accepted: June 29, 2020

© 2020, Korea Health Personnel Licensing Examination Institute

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • This study aimed to evaluate perceptions of safety and preparedness among health workers caring for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients before and after a multi-professional simulation-based course in Pakistan. Health workers’ perceptions of preparedness, safety, and their willingness to care for COVID-19 patients were measured before and after they attended a simulation-based training course to prepare them to care for COVID-19 patients at Combined Military Hospital Landi Kotal Cantt, from March 1 to April 30, 2020. The participants’ perceived level of safety and preparedness to care for COVID-19 patients before the simulation-based course was low, but increased after completing it (P<0.05). They felt confident and were significantly more willing to care for patients with COVID-19 or other infections requiring strict isolation. Simulation-based training is an effective tool to improve perceptions of risk and readiness to deal with COVID-19 among medical and non-medical health workers in Pakistan.
The first case of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Pakistan was reported in Karachi, on February 26, 2020 [1]. At Combined Military Hospital (CMH) Landi Kotal Cantt in Pakistan, we arranged a special course for COVID-19. We formulated a training course that also included the non-medical staff of the hospital, including those working in the laundry service, security, and sanitation departments. The people in these professions are also at risk of being exposed to droplet-borne infections such as COVID-19. We also included simulation-based exercises in the training course. These exercises included carrying out clinical procedures such as endotracheal intubation, collection of blood samples, and collection of nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal samples for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing for the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 on a manikin. We used mock patients to practice safe transport from one department of the hospital to another by the security staff. We simulated spillages of blood and vomitus on floor and linen for the sanitation and laundry staff to practice dealing with highly infectious materials and surfaces.
This study aimed to determine whether health workers’ perceived levels of preparedness, safety, and willingness to care for COVID-19 patients changed after attending the simulation-based course. We hypothesized that this simulation-based training would impart confidence and a sense of preparedness to care for COVID-19 patients.
We obtained permission from the Hospital Ethical Board to conduct our study (02/2020). Informed consent was obtained from the participants.
This was a survey-based descriptive study.
The participants in the study included nurses, doctors, nursing assistants, sanitation workers, ambulance drivers, and laundry service providers who attended the COVID-19 training course. Hospital staff who would not have any contact with patients or infectious materials (e.g., those on administrative duties) were excluded. Personnel with pre-existing medical conditions such as pulmonary diseases, ischemic heart disease, diabetes mellitus, or who were immunocompromised were also excluded from participation, as they are prone to have complications if they contract COVID-19 [2].
The study was conducted at CMH Landi Kotal Cantt, Khyber District from March 1 to April 30, 2020. This hospital is 1 of the 2 hospitals in Landi Kotal that have been designated to care for COVID-19 patients.
The hospital education department formulated the multi-professional training course to put the hospital action plan for COVID-19 into practice. The biosafety and infectious disease protocols of the hospital had already been revised and updated for COVID-19 as per the guidelines of the National Institute of Health in Islamabad. The training course was formulated in consultation with a medical and infectious disease specialist to cover the following aspects of the management of suspected and confirmed COVID-19 patients: (1) personal protective equipment (PPE) use; (2) the hospital’s biosafety protocols; (3) procedures such as oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal sampling for PCR tests, intravenous blood sampling, patients’ bodily hygiene, and cleaning performed by the clinical staff on the patient; and, (4) procedures such as disinfection of surfaces and cleaning of infectious fluids (e.g., blood and vomitus) by sanitation staff, transport of patients and subsequent disinfection of the ambulance by the ambulance staff, clearing the corridors while maintaining patient isolation by the security staff, and collection and treatment of contaminated linen by laundry managers.
There were interactive classroom sessions and practical sessions in which every participant was required to don and doff PPE including gloves, gowns, goggles, N95 (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health-approved) and surgical masks, face shields, splash-resistant aprons, and whole-body anti-viral suits. Clinical procedures were practiced using simulation techniques with the help of mock patients and manikins. Multiple scenarios were simulated and practiced as per the hospital protocols.
All the participants of the training course were invited to participate in our study. We obtained permission to use and modify the questionnaire used by Carvalho et al. [3]. The questionnaire consisted of 2 parts. The first part contained questions about participants’ characteristics such as age, sex, their field of work/department, years of experience, any experience of participating in simulation-based training, and experience of caring for patients with infectious diseases. The second part contained 8 questions regarding their perceptions of risk and their preparedness to work with patients with COVID-19 or other infections requiring strict isolation (biosafety level III/ IV) (Supplement 1). The participants responded on a 10-point Likert scale. They were asked to complete the questionnaire before starting the training course and after finishing it.
The data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics ver. 23.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The frequency and percentages of categorical variables were calculated. For continuous variables, the median and interquartile range (25th–75th percentiles) were calculated. The Mann-Whitney U-test was used to test the significance of differences between independent samples.
The demographic characteristics of the 44 participants are shown in Table 1.
After the course, all the questionnaire results showed significant changes (P<0.05) (Dataset 1). The participants felt better prepared to take care of patients with infections requiring strict isolation such as COVID-19. They considered other participants of the course to be ready for it too. Moreover, their perceptions regarding the preparedness of those colleagues who had not attended the course were significantly lower. They felt safer and were significantly more willing to participate in the management of COVID-19 patients. Finally, their fear of working with a patient requiring high isolation was also reduced after attending the course. The responses provided by the participants before and after the course are shown in Fig. 1 using box plots.
Our results showed that at the start of the course, the participants perceived themselves to be neither prepared nor motivated to take care of COVID-19 patients. They also did not feel safe in dealing with such patients. However, at the end of the course, there were significant improvements in perceptions of preparedness, willingness to work, and the feeling of being safe when working with patients with COVID-19. Varying results have been reported in other studies regarding perceptions of preparedness after simulation-based training. Prescott and Garside [4] reported that all the participants of their study felt better prepared for the assigned tasks after a simulation-based training. However, it has also been reported that fewer participants felt prepared for the tasks for which they had received simulation-based training [5]. Our study showed a significant improvement in perceptions of preparedness among the participants after the training.
The participants in our training course believed from the beginning that their colleagues who were not attending the course were not prepared to handle COVID-19 patients. At the end of the course, this perception was strengthened. This implies that they perceived that the course had prepared them for the challenge of caring for COVID-19 patients as compared to their colleagues who had not trained with them. We interpreted this result as validating the effectiveness of our new multi-disciplinary training course.
We saw that the feeling of fear regarding caring for infectious patients requiring strict isolation was reduced after the participants had completed the course. Fear is an irrational feeling that can hamper performance. Fear can also hamper learning. It is important that health personnel feel safe while learning, and simulation-based training provides a safe environment to learn to deal with a broad range of potentially dangerous situations [6]. Thus, simulation-based learning effectively imparts confidence, competence, and knowledge to the learner. If they feel safe, we can assume that they would be able to deliver better care to the patients.
At the end of simulation-based training, there is usually a debriefing session, which is considered to be a crucial part of the learning exercise. We also found debriefing to be invaluable in our course. It was used to reinforce good practices and to reflect upon, discuss, and improve aspects that had not been performed up to the mark. It gave the participants insights and helped them develop a better understanding of the rationale behind the procedures.
It has been reported that repeated team-based simulation training increased the frequency of task completion [7]. The reason may be either familiarity with the role that each member of the team plays in a given situation or reduction in anxiety with practice. Thus, we recommend that essential skills and procedures should be practiced through regular simulation-based training programs organized at hospitals.
The sample size was small and the study was conducted at only 1 hospital. Therefore, the results cannot be generalized. It is recommended that we follow up this study with a larger sample size and conduct it at multiple institutions. Furthermore, simulations should be compared with other training methods to clarify their effect on perceptions of safety and preparedness to care for patients with infections requiring strict isolation. This will help in formulating appropriate training programs for health care workers from different departments and will yield maximum benefits.
Multi-professional simulation-based training imparted confidence and a sense of preparedness among health workers to care for patients with infections that require strict isolation, such as COVID-19. The feelings of insecurity and fear regarding caring for such patients were reduced through such training programs.

Authors’ contributions

Conceptualization: JAK, MRBK. Data curation: JAK. Formal analysis: JAK, MRBK. Methodology: JAK, MRBK. Project administration: JAK, MRBK. Visualization: JAK, MRBK. Writing–original draft: JAK. Writing–review & editing: JAK, MRBK.

Conflict of interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.



Data availability

Data files are available from Harvard Dataverse:

Dataset 1. Raw data.


We acknowledge Amna Mahmood for her guidance in the statistical analysis of the study.
Data files are available from Harvard Dataverse:
Supplement 1. Questionnaire assessing the perceived level of preparedness and safety regarding the management of infected patients that require high isolation.
Supplement 2. Audio recording of the abstract.
Fig. 1.
Answers to the questions regarding perceptions of preparedness, risk, and willingness to care for patients with COVID-19 or other infections requiring high isolation before and after the simulation-based training course. (A) Q1: I feel ready to participate in the management of patients infected with COVID-19. (B) Q2: I feel ready to participate in the management of patients with infections that require high isolation. (C) Q3: I think that my colleagues who are participating in the course are ready to manage patients with COVID-19 or other infections that require high isolation. (D) Q4: I think that my colleagues who are not participating in the course are ready to manage patients with COVID-19 or other infections that require high isolation. (E) Q5: I feel safe if I had to participate in the management of a patient infected with COVID-19. (F) Q6: If today I have to take care of a patient infected with COVID-19, I would do it. (G) Q7: If today I have to take care of a patient with an infection requiring high isolation measures, I would do it. (H) Q8: I am afraid to participate in the management of a patient infected with COVID-19 or other agents requiring high isolation. COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019.
Table 1.
Characteristics of the participants in the COVID-19 training course
Participant characteristic No (%)
Age (yr)
 21–30 26 (59)
 31–40 14 (31.8)
 41–50 4 (10)
 Male 36 (81.8)
 Female 8 (18.2)
Professional experience (yr)
 ≤5 7 (15.9)
 6–10 23 (52.3)
 11–15 11 (25)
 16–20 3 (6.8)
 Nursing assistants 19 (43.1)
 Sanitation workers 8 (18.2)
 Doctors 7 (15.9)
 Security staff 4 (10)
 Nurses 3 (6.8)
 Laundry staff 3 (6.8)
Experience with simulation
 Yes 5 (11.4)
 No 39 (88.6)
Experience of working with infectious patients requiring isolation
 Yes 18 (40.9)
 No 26 (59.1)

COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019.

Figure & Data



    Citations to this article as recorded by  
    • Health Care Simulation as a Training Tool for Epidemic Management
      Marcia A. Corvetto, Fernando R. Altermatt, Francisca Belmar, Eliana Escudero
      Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Factors Affecting the Preparedness to Care for Patients with Highly Infectious Diseases among Nursing Staff in Long-term Care Hospitals: A Cross-Sectional Descriptive Study
      Ye Seul Lee, Min Hye Lee
      Korean Journal of Adult Nursing.2023; 35(1): 35.     CrossRef
    • COVID-19 Pandemic Support Programs for Healthcare Workers and Implications for Occupational Mental Health: A Narrative Review
      Eden David, Jonathan M. DePierro, Deborah B. Marin, Vanshdeep Sharma, Dennis S. Charney, Craig L. Katz
      Psychiatric Quarterly.2022; 93(1): 227.     CrossRef
    • How stressful was the COVID-19 pandemic for residents specializing in family practice?. A study of stressors and psychological well-being of physicians in further training specializing in family practice (GP trainees) within a pandemic context
      Anna-Maria von Oltersdorff-Kalettka, Janina Meinel, Karen Voigt, Thomas Mundt, Markus Bleckwenn, Antje Bergmann, Mandy Gottschall
      BMC Primary Care.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • An update on developments in medical education in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: A BEME scoping review: BEME Guide No. 64
      Michelle Daniel, Morris Gordon, Madalena Patricio, Ahmad Hider, Cameron Pawlik, Rhea Bhagdev, Shoaib Ahmad, Sebastian Alston, Sophie Park, Teresa Pawlikowska, Eliot Rees, Andrea Jane Doyle, Mohan Pammi, Satid Thammasitboon, Mary Haas, William Peterson, Ma
      Medical Teacher.2021; 43(3): 253.     CrossRef
    • Training in healthcare during and after COVID-19: proposal for simulation training
      Carolina Felipe Soares Brandão, Ellen Cristina Bergamasco, Gabriela Furst Vaccarezza, Maria Luiza Ferreira de Barba, Enrico Ferreira Martins de Andrade, Dario Cecilio-Fernandes
      Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira.2021; 67( suppl 1): 12.     CrossRef
    • COVID-19 Critical Care Simulations: An International Cross-Sectional Survey
      Mohamad-Hani Temsah, Abdulkarim Alrabiaah, Ayman Al-Eyadhy, Fahad Al-Sohime, Abdullah Al Huzaimi, Nurah Alamro, Khalid Alhasan, Vaibhavi Upadhye, Amr Jamal, Fadi Aljamaan, Ali Alhaboob, Yaseen M. Arabi, Marc Lazarovici, Ali M. Somily, Abdulaziz M. Boker
      Frontiers in Public Health.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Interprofessional work in health in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review
      Sâmara Fontes Fernandes, Jaira Gonçalves Trigueiro, Márcio Adriano Fernandes Barreto, Rhanna Emanuela Fontenele Lima de Carvalho, Maria Rocineide Ferreira da Silva, Thereza Maria Magalhães Moreira, Marcelo Viana da Costa, Rodrigo Jácob Moreira de Freitas
      Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Effect of Simulation-Based Education on the Preparedness of Healthcare Professionals for the COVID-19 Pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis
      Marc-André Maheu-Cadotte, Alexandra Lapierre, Guillaume Fontaine, Tanya Mailhot, Patrick Lavoie
      Science of Nursing and Health Practices.2021; 4(1): 1.     CrossRef
    • Being Prepared During the Evolving COVID-19 Pandemic: A Neonatal Experience in Training and Simulation
      Juin Yee Kong, Srabani Samanta Bharadwaj, Amutha Chinnadurai, Selina Kah Ying Ho
      Frontiers in Pediatrics.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Reflections as 2020 comes to an end: the editing and educational environment during the COVID-19 pandemic, the power of Scopus and Web of Science in scholarly publishing, journal statistics, and appreciation to reviewers and volunteers
      Sun Huh
      Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2020; 17: 44.     CrossRef

    We recommend

    JEEHP : Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions