Purpose Undertaking a standard-setting exercise is a common method for setting pass/fail cut scores for high-stakes examinations. The recently introduced equal Z standard-setting method (EZ method) has been found to be a valid and effective alternative for the commonly used Angoff and Hofstee methods and their variants. The current study aims to estimate the minimum number of panelists required for obtaining acceptable and reliable cut scores using the EZ method.
Methods The primary data were extracted from 31 panelists who used the EZ method for setting cut scores for a 12-station of medical school’s final objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) in Taiwan. For this study, a new data set composed of 1,000 random samples of different panel sizes, ranging from 5 to 25 panelists, was established and analyzed. Analysis of variance was performed to measure the differences in the cut scores set by the sampled groups, across all sizes within each station.
Results On average, a panel of 10 experts or more yielded cut scores with confidence more than or equal to 90% and 15 experts yielded cut scores with confidence more than or equal to 95%. No significant differences in cut scores associated with panel size were identified for panels of 5 or more experts.
Conclusion The EZ method was found to be valid and feasible. Less than an hour was required for 12 panelists to assess 12 OSCE stations. Calculating the cut scores required only basic statistical skills.
The goal of accreditation is to ensure that the education provided by an institution of higher education meets an acceptable level of quality. This study developed standards and criteria for accreditation of baccalaureate nursing education programs, by comparing accreditation in South Korea and in the United States, and validating standards and criteria. A main comparative analysis was made between Nursing League for Nursing Accrediting Commission (NLNAC) standards, Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (CCNE) standards for accreditation of baccalaureate nursing education programs, and Korean Accreditation Board of Nursing standards for accreditation of nursing education programs. The research team developed and validated standards and criteria for South Korean baccalaureate nursing education programs. Using the results of the analysis, revisions are proposed to standards for accreditation of baccalaureate nursing education programs, and categorized into 24 criteria and six domains: mission and governance, curriculum and teaching-learning practices, students, faculty, resources, effectiveness. Further studies are required to refine the standards and criteria and make them sophisticated enough to be applied globally.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Effect of Symptom Severity on the Quality of Life in Women with Urinary Incontinence: A Comparative Study Figen Kazankaya, Sezer Er Güneri The Anatolian Journal of General Medical Research.2024; : 40. CrossRef
Development and Psychometric Testing of a Self-Rated Scale Based on National Nursing Core Competency Standards Al D. Biag, Vanessa L. Belen Journal of Nursing Measurement.2022; 30(1): 75. CrossRef
The Positive Effects of Accreditation on Graduate Medical Education Programs in Singapore Kathleen D. Holt, Rebecca S. Miller, Lauren M. Byrne, Susan H. Day Journal of Graduate Medical Education.2019; 11(4s): 213. CrossRef
Analysis of Survey of Interdisciplinary Unification of Biomedical Laboratory Science Hong Sung Kim, Ji-Hyuk Kang, Man-Gil Yang, Chang-Eun Park, Kyung-A Shin, Pil Seung Kwon The Korean Journal of Clinical Laboratory Science.2018; 50(3): 289. CrossRef
Development and Evaluation of Korean Nurses’ Core Competency Scale (KNCCS) Won-Hee Lee, Sanghee Kim, Jihyoun An Open Journal of Nursing.2017; 07(05): 599. CrossRef
Direction of the Community Health Nursing Practice Education Focusing on the Nursing Education Accreditation Criteria Kyung Ja June, Young Ran Chin, Hee Girl Kim, Chun Mi Kim, Yeon Yi Song, Souk Young Kim, Hanju Lee, Ihn Sook Jeong, Ki Soon Seo, Kyung Won Choi Journal of Korean Academy of Community Health Nursing.2016; 27(2): 183. CrossRef
A study on Korean nursing students' educational outcomes Kasil Oh, Yang Heui Ahn, Hyang-Yeon Lee, Sook-Ja Lee, In-Ja Kim, Kyung-Sook Choi, Myung-Sook Ko Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2011; 8: 3. CrossRef
Faculty Perceptions of the Improvement and Effort for the Achievement of Quality in Nursing Education through Accreditation in Baccalaureate Nursing Programs Kon Hee Kim Korean Medical Education Review.2011; 13(2): 59. CrossRef
Critical thinking is the basis of professional nursing practice and is essential in the current complex health care delivery system. A major goal of baccalaureate nursing education is the development and promotion of students' ability to think critically. In America, the National League for nursing outcome-oriented accreditation process challenged nursing faculty to think about teaching and evaluating critical thinking. Based on nursing literature, the findings were inconsistent because of a lack of consensus on a definition of critical thinking and the measurement of critical thinking utilizing critical thinking instruments non-specific for nursing. However, a variety of teaching-learning strategies in nursing education were effective in the development of critical thinking dispositions and skills among nursing students. The author provides insight and ideas for nursing faculty as follows: 1) nursing programs must define critical thinking operationally in relation to their curricula; 2)nursing faculty must be knowledgeable concerning evaluation of critical thinking disposition and skills and construct a standardized critical-thinking instrument that is specific to the discipline of nursing; 3) nursing faculty must develop teaching-learning strategy in nursing education for improving students' critical thinking abilities. These are prerequisite for critical thinking which should be considered as a criterion in The Standards of Nursing Education in Korea.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Factors Influencing Competency in Evidence-based Practice among Clinical Nurses Yeon-Sook Kim, Jimee Kim, Mi-Mi Park Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration.2015; 21(2): 143. CrossRef
The Effects of Video-based Peer assisted Learning in Standardized Patients Simulation: Pre and Post Operative Care In-Hee Park, Sujin Shin Korean Journal of Adult Nursing.2015; 27(1): 73. CrossRef
Influence of Critical Thinking Disposition on Satisfaction with Clinical Practice and Intention of Recommendation among Paramedic Students Mi-Young Choi, Tae-Young Moon, Hyun-Ji Lee Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society.2013; 14(3): 1301. CrossRef
Exploring Nursing Education Modality for Facilitating Undergraduate Students' Critical Thinking: Focus Group Interview Analysis Sung Ok Chang, Eun Suk Kong, Chun Gil Kim, Hee Kyung Kim, Mi Soon Song, Soo Yeon Ahn, Young Whee Lee, Myung Ok Cho, Kyung Sook Choi, Nam Cho Kim Korean Journal of Adult Nursing.2013; 25(2): 125. CrossRef
Critical Thinking Disposition and Self-esteem of Psychiatric Mental Health Nurses Moonhee Gang Journal of Korean Academy of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing.2011; 20(4): 404. CrossRef
Development of Standards and Criteria for Accreditation of Baccalaureate Nursing Education Program Yang Heui Ahn, Kyung Sook Park, Soon Ok Yang, Kyung Rim Shin, Mi Ja Kim Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2005; 2: 87. CrossRef