Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions

Brief Reports

How prepared are medical students to diagnose and manage common ocular conditions: Elizabeth Shanika Esparaz, S. Bruce Binder, Nicole J. Borges; J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2014;11:29. Published online November 23, 2014; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2014.11.29

25,138 View
144 Download
8 Web of Science
7 Crossref

It is essential that primary care physicians have a solid fund of knowledge of the diagnosis and management of common eye conditions as well as ocular emergencies, as management of these diseases commonly involves appropriate referral to an ophthalmologist. Thus, it is crucial to receive comprehensive clinical knowledge of ophthalmic disease in the primary care setting during medical school. This study investigated how well prepared medical students are to diagnose and manage common ocular conditions. The study used scores from a standardized 12-question quiz administered to fourth-year medical students (N = 97; 88% response rate) and second-year medical students (N = 97; 97% response rate). The quiz comprising diagnosis and referral management questions covered the most frequently tested ophthalmology topics on board exams and assessed students’ ability to recognize when referral to an ophthalmologist is appropriate. Fourth-year medical students had quiz scores ranging from 0%-94.5% with an average score of 68.7%. Second-year students had quiz scores ranging from 27.2%–86.4%, with an average score of 63.8%. Passing rate was 70%. Student’s t-test showed fourth-year students had a significantly higher quiz average (P = 0.003). In general, both classes performed better on diagnostic questions (fourth-year, 73.7%; second year, 65.8%) rather than on management questions (fourth-year, 64.8%; second year, 61.8%). Both second-year and fourth-year students on average fell short on passing the ophthalmology proficiency quiz, and in general students were more adept at diagnosing rather than managing ocular conditions and emergencies.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

A Systematic Review of Ophthalmology Education in Medical Schools
Sascha K.R. Spencer, Patrick A. Ireland, Jorja Braden, Jenny L. Hepschke, Michael Lin, Helen Zhang, Jessie Channell, Hessom Razavi, Angus W. Turner, Minas T. Coroneo, Boaz Shulruf, Ashish Agar
Ophthalmology.2024; 131(7): 855. CrossRef
The Decline of Basic Ophthalmology in General Medical Education: A Scoping Review and Recommended Potential Solutions
Jennifer Liao, Robin Redmon Wright, Gargi K Vora
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Matching of advanced undergraduate medical students’ competence profiles with the required competence profiles of their specialty of choice for postgraduate training
Lea Jebram, Sarah Prediger, Viktor Oubaid, Sigrid Harendza
BMC Medical Education.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Assessment of Ophthalmology Teaching and its Impact on the Choice of Future Specialties Among Medical Students of Jazan University
Ismail Abuallut, Eman Hurissi, Bandar M Abuageelah, Mona Alfaifi, Alshomokh Hakami, Alanoud Qadri, Afnan Hakami, Saleh Ghulaysi
Cureus.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Medical Schools’ Ophthalmology Course: An Appraisal by Ophthalmology Residents
Yahya Abdulrahman Al-Najmi, Ahmed Hussein Subki, Nazih Suwalih Alzaidi, Nadeem Shafique Butt, Alaa Abdulhamid Alsammahi, Firas Mohamed Madani, Mohammed Saad Alsallum, Rakan Salah Al-Harbi, Nizar Mohammed Alhibshi
International Journal of General Medicine.2021; Volume 14: 8365. CrossRef
Quantitative analysis of medical students’ and physicians’ knowledge of degenerative cervical myelopathy
Mueez Waqar, Jane Wilcock, Jayne Garner, Benjamin Davies, Mark Kotter
BMJ Open.2020; 10(1): e028455. CrossRef
Ophthalmology training and competency levels in caring for patients with ophthalmic complaints among United States internal medicine, emergency medicine, and family medicine residents
Christopher Daniel Gelston, Jennifer Landrigan Patnaik
Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2019; 16: 25. CrossRef

Continuing medical education as a national strategy to improve access to primary care in Saudi Arabia: Sami Ayed Alshammary, Savithiri Ratnapalan, Zekeriya Akturk; J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2013;10:7. Published online August 31, 2013; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2013.10.7

30,835 View
174 Download
1 Crossref

Abstract PDF

The purpose of this study was to describe the development, implementation, and evaluation of an educational program in family medicine for general practitioners in Saudi Arabia from 2009 to 2011. A continuing medical education program called Family Medicine Education (FAME) was developed with 7 modules each consisting of 12-14 hours of teaching to be delivered in 3 day blocks, over 45 days. Twenty percent (2,761) of all general practitioners participated in the FAME program. Initial assessment of the program showed significant improvement of knowledge from scores of 49% on a pre-test to 89% on post-tests. FAME program in Saudi Arabia facilitated primary care physicians’ knowledge.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Current Practices and Existing Gaps of Continuing Medical Education among Resident Physicians in Abha City, Saudi Arabia
Safar Abadi Alsaleem, Najwa Mohammed Almoalwi, Aesha Farheen Siddiqui, Mohammed Abadi Alsaleem, Awad S. Alsamghan, Nabil J. Awadalla, Ahmed A. Mahfouz
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2020; 17(22): 8483. CrossRef

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search