Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions

Technical report

Development of examination objectives based on nursing competency for the Korean Nursing Licensing Examination: a validity study: Sujin Shin, Gwang Suk Kim, Jun-Ah Song, Inyoung Lee; J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2022;19:19. Published online August 22, 2022; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2022.19.19

5,789 View
255 Download
3 Web of Science
3 Crossref

Purpose
This study aimed to develop the examination objectives based on nursing competency of the Korean Nursing Licensing Examination.
Methods
This is a validity study to develop the examination objectives based on nursing competency. Data were collected in December 2021. We reviewed the literature related to changing nurse roles and on the learning objectives for the Korea Medical Licensing Examination and other health personnel licensing examinations. Thereafter, we created a draft of the nursing problems list for examination objectives based on the literature review, and the content validity was evaluated by experts. A final draft of the examination objectives is presented and discussed.
Results
A total of 4 domains, 12 classes, and 85 nursing problems for the Korean Nursing Liscensing Examination were developed. They included the essentials of objectives, related factors, evaluation goals, related activity statements, related clients, related settings, and specific outcomes.
Conclusion
This study developed a draft of the examination objectives based on clinical competency that were related to the clinical situations of nurses and comprised appropriate test items for the licensing examination. Above results may be able to provide fundamental data for item development that reflects future nursing practices.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

A validity study of COMLEX-USA Level 3 with the new test design
Xia Mao, John R. Boulet, Jeanne M. Sandella, Michael F. Oliverio, Larissa Smith
Journal of Osteopathic Medicine.2024; 124(6): 257. CrossRef
A Survey on Perceptions of the Direction of Korean Medicine Education and National Licensing Examination
Han-Byul Cho, Won-Suk Sung, Jiseong Hong, Yeonseok Kang, Eun-Jung Kim
Healthcare.2023; 11(12): 1685. CrossRef
Suggestion for item allocation to 8 nursing activity categories of the Korean Nursing Licensing Examination: a survey-based descriptive study
Kyunghee Kim, So Young Kang, Younhee Kang, Youngran Kweon, Hyunjung Kim, Youngshin Song, Juyeon Cho, Mi-Young Choi, Hyun Su Lee
Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2023; 20: 18. CrossRef

Research articles

Using the Angoff method to set a standard on mock exams for the Korean Nursing Licensing Examination: Mi Kyoung Yim, Sujin Shin; J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2020;17:14. Published online April 22, 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2020.17.14

11,504 View
225 Download
15 Web of Science
12 Crossref

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material

Purpose
This study explored the possibility of using the Angoff method, in which panel experts determine the cut score of an exam, for the Korean Nursing Licensing Examination (KNLE). Two mock exams for the KNLE were analyzed. The Angoff standard setting procedure was conducted and the results were analyzed. We also aimed to examine the procedural validity of applying the Angoff method in this context.
Methods
For both mock exams, we set a pass-fail cut score using the Angoff method. The standard setting panel consisted of 16 nursing professors. After the Angoff procedure, the procedural validity of establishing the standard was evaluated by investigating the responses of the standard setters.
Results
The descriptions of the minimally competent person for the KNLE were presented at the levels of general and subject performance. The cut scores of first and second mock exams were 74.4 and 76.8, respectively. These were higher than the traditional cut score (60% of the total score of the KNLE). The panel survey showed very positive responses, with scores higher than 4 out of 5 points on a Likert scale.
Conclusion
The scores calculated for both mock tests were similar, and were much higher than the existing cut scores. In the second simulation, the standard deviation of the Angoff rating was lower than in the first simulation. According to the survey results, procedural validity was acceptable, as shown by a high level of confidence. The results show that determining cut scores by an expert panel is an applicable method.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

The Nursing Student Licensure Examination: A Scoping Review
Flavia Pantaleo, Alessandro Stievano, Chiara Mastroianni, Giorgia Petrucci, Natascia Mazzitelli, Michela Piredda, Maria Grazia De Marinis, Anna Marchetti
Nursing Reports.2025; 15(8): 299. CrossRef
Optimal cutoff score for the Malay version of parenting and child tooth brushing assessment (M-PACTA)
Yu Jie Chin, Jennifer Geraldine Doss, Sabri Musa, Danaee Mahmoud, Shani Ann Mani
BMC Oral Health.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Angoff methods in standard setting in health professional education: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Kannan Sridharan, Gowri Sivaramakrishnan
BMC Medical Education.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Comparing the passing rates of nursing students participating in the objective structured clinical examination using fixed score, Angoff, yes/no Angoff, and 3-level Angoff methods†
Fatemeh Maghsoodi, Mohammadreza Yazdankhahfard, Shahnaz Pouladi, Kamran Mirzaei, Amin Beigzadeh
Frontiers of Nursing.2025; 12(4): 511. CrossRef
Experts’ prediction of item difficulty of multiple-choice questions in the Ethiopian Undergraduate Medicine Licensure Examination
Shewatatek Gedamu Wonde, Tefera Tadesse, Belay Moges, Stefan K. Schauber
BMC Medical Education.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Standard setting methods in objective structured clinical examination (OSCE): A comparative study of five methods
Reshma Ansari, Norhafizah Ab Manan, Nur Ain Mahat, Norfaizatul Shalida Omar, Atikah Abdul Latiff, Sara Idris, Azli Shahril Othman
Journal of Medical Education Development.2024; 17(56): 87. CrossRef
Comparing Estimated and Real Item Difficulty Using Multi-Facet Rasch Analysis
Ayfer SAYIN, Sebahat GÖREN
Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi.2023; 14(4): 440. CrossRef
Application of computer-based testing in the Korean Medical Licensing Examination, the emergence of the metaverse in medical education, journal metrics and statistics, and appreciation to reviewers and volunteers
Sun Huh
Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2022; 19: 2. CrossRef
Possibility of using the yes/no Angoff method as a substitute for the percent Angoff method for estimating the cutoff score of the Korean Medical Licensing Examination: a simulation study
Janghee Park
Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2022; 19: 23. CrossRef
Development of examination objectives based on nursing competency for the Korean Nursing Licensing Examination: a validity study
Sujin Shin, Gwang Suk Kim, Jun-Ah Song, Inyoung Lee
Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2022; 19: 19. CrossRef
Possibility of independent use of the yes/no Angoff and Hofstee methods for the standard setting of the Korean Medical Licensing Examination written test: a descriptive study
Do-Hwan Kim, Ye Ji Kang, Hoon-Ki Park
Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2022; 19: 33. CrossRef
Comparing the cut score for the borderline group method and borderline regression method with norm-referenced standard setting in an objective structured clinical examination in medical school in Korea
Song Yi Park, Sang-Hwa Lee, Min-Jeong Kim, Ki-Hwan Ji, Ji Ho Ryu
Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2021; 18: 25. CrossRef

Perception survey on the introduction of clinical performance examination as part of the national nursing licensing examination in Korea: Su Jin Shin, Yeong Kyeong Kim, Soon-Rim Suh, Duk Yoo Jung, Yunju Kim, Mi Kyoung Yim; J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2017;14:26. Published online October 25, 2017; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2017.14.26

34,961 View
310 Download
2 Web of Science
5 Crossref

Abstract PDF

Purpose
The purpose of this study was to analyze opinions about the action plan for implementation of clinical performance exam as part of the national nursing licensing examination and presents the expected effects of the performance exam and aspects to consider regarding its implementation.
Methods
This study used a mixed-methods design. Quantitative data were collected by a questionnaire survey, while qualitative data were collected by focus group interviews with experts. The survey targeted 200 nursing professors and clinical nurses with more than 5 years of work experience, and the focus group interviews were conducted with 28 of professors, clinical instructors, and nurses at hospitals.
Results
First, nursing professors and clinical specialists agreed that the current written tests have limitations in evaluating examinees’ ability, and that the introduction of a clinical performance exam will yield positive results. Clinical performance exam is necessary to evaluate and improve nurses’ work ability, which means that the implementation of a performance exam is advisable if its credibility and validity can be verified. Second, most respondents chose direct performance exams using simulators or standardized patients as the most suitable format of the test.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the current national nursing licensing exam is somewhat limited in its ability to identify competent nurses. Thus, the time has come for us to seriously consider the introduction of a performance exam. The prerequisites for successfully implementing clinical performance exam as part of the national nursing licensing exam are a professional training process and forming a consortium to standardize practical training.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

The Clinical Nursing Competency Assessment System of Ghana: Perspectives of Key Informants
Oboshie Anim-Boamah, Christmal Dela Christmals, Susan Jennifer Armstrong
Sage Open.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Adaptation of Extended Reality Smart Glasses for Core Nursing Skill Training Among Undergraduate Nursing Students: Usability and Feasibility Study
Sun Kyung Kim, Youngho Lee, Hyoseok Yoon, Jongmyung Choi
Journal of Medical Internet Research.2021; 23(3): e24313. CrossRef
Nursing Students’ Experiences on Clinical Competency Assessment in Ghana
Oboshie Anim-Boamah, Christmal Dela Christmals, Susan Jennifer Armstrong
Nurse Media Journal of Nursing.2021; 11(3): 278. CrossRef
Clinical nursing competency assessment: a scoping review
Oboshie Anim-Boamah, Christmal Dela Christmals, Susan Jennifer Armstrong
Frontiers of Nursing.2021; 8(4): 341. CrossRef
Factors Influencing the Success of the National Nursing Competency Examination taken by the Nursing Diploma Students in Yogyakarta
Yulia Wardani
Jurnal Ners.2020; 14(2): 172. CrossRef

Technical Reports

The job analysis of Korean nurses as a strategy to improve the Korean Nursing Licensing Examination: In Sook Park, Yeon Ok Suh, Hae Sook Park, Soo Yeon Ahn, So Young Kang, Il Sun Ko; J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2016;13:24. Published online June 7, 2016; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2016.13.24

35,933 View
298 Download
6 Web of Science
6 Crossref

Abstract PDF

Purpose
This study aimed at characterizing Korean nurses’ occupational responsibilities to apply the results for improvement of the Korean Nursing Licensing Examination. Methods: First, the contents of nursing job were defined based on a focus group interview of 15 nurses. Developing a Curriculum (DACOM) method was used to examine those results and produce the questionnaire by 13 experts. After that, the questionnaire survey to 5,065 hospital nurses was done. Results: The occupational responsibilities of nurses were characterized as involving 8 duties, 49 tasks, and 303 task elements. Those 8 duties are nursing management and professional development, safety and infection control, the management of potential risk factors, basic nursing and caring, the maintenance of physiological integrity, medication and parenteral treatments, socio-psychological integrity, and the maintenance and improvement of health. Conclusion: The content of Korean Nursing Licensing Examination should be improved based on 8 duties and 49 tasks of the occupational responsibilities of Korean nurses.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Are Art-Based Interventions Effective in Improving Psychological Well-Being Among Informal Caregivers of Cancer Patients? A Systematic Review
Mengqin Zhang, Xing Liu, Yan Huang
Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine.2025; 31(1): 11. CrossRef
Community of inquiry Framework Combined With Podcast Media in Nursing Education innovation During Covid-19 Pandemic: An Evaluative Study
Ah Yusuf, Ronal Surya Aditya, Daifallah M AlRazeeni, Reem Lafi AlMutairi, Fitriana Kurniasari Solikhah, Siti Kotijah, Wiwit Dwi Nurbadriyah
Advances in Medical Education and Practice.2023; Volume 14: 573. CrossRef
Suggestion for item allocation to 8 nursing activity categories of the Korean Nursing Licensing Examination: a survey-based descriptive study
Kyunghee Kim, So Young Kang, Younhee Kang, Youngran Kweon, Hyunjung Kim, Youngshin Song, Juyeon Cho, Mi-Young Choi, Hyun Su Lee
Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2023; 20: 18. CrossRef
Item development process and analysis of 50 case-based items for implementation on the Korean Nursing Licensing Examination
In Sook Park, Yeon Ok Suh, Hae Sook Park, So Young Kang, Kwang Sung Kim, Gyung Hee Kim, Yeon-Hee Choi, Hyun-Ju Kim
Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2017; 14: 20. CrossRef
The Knowledge of Nurses on Standards of Job Description at the Intensive Care Units of Broujerd Hospitals, 2016
Kobrs Rashidi, Mahoush Kalhor, Mahdi Berjandi
Iranian Journal of Nursing Research.2017; 12(4): 32. CrossRef
Relevance of the test content of the Korean Nursing Licensing Examination to nursing job
In Sook Park, Yeon Ok Suh, Hae Sook Park, Soo Yeon Ahn, So Young Kang, Kwang Sung Kim
Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2016; 13: 23. CrossRef

Relevance of the test content of the Korean Nursing Licensing Examination to nursing job: In Sook Park, Yeon Ok Suh, Hae Sook Park, Soo Yeon Ahn, So Young Kang, Kwang Sung Kim; J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2016;13:23. Published online June 2, 2016; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2016.13.23

32,505 View
218 Download
2 Web of Science
3 Crossref

Abstract PDF

Purpose
This study aimed at identifying if there is a relevance of content of the Korean Nursing Licensing Examination (KNLE) revised in 2014 to nursing job. It will be able to provide the validity of revised content of the KNLE. Methods: From October 13 to November 13, 2015, print version of 8 duties with 49-tasks, 155-job item questionnaires were distributed to 1,305 hospital nurses and 202 nursing faculties in Korea. Results were treated by descriptive statistics and comparison analysis. There were responses from 946 nurses or professors (72.5%). Results: The relevance of test content of KNLE to nursing job was shown to be valid with over 3 points out of 4 point Likert scale in all items: from 3.23 at lowest to 3.64 at top. Conclusion: Above results showed that the revised version of KNLE in 2014 was valid to test the nursing students’ knowledge for job performance.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Suggestion for item allocation to 8 nursing activity categories of the Korean Nursing Licensing Examination: a survey-based descriptive study
Kyunghee Kim, So Young Kang, Younhee Kang, Youngran Kweon, Hyunjung Kim, Youngshin Song, Juyeon Cho, Mi-Young Choi, Hyun Su Lee
Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2023; 20: 18. CrossRef
Nursing Students’ Experiences on Clinical Competency Assessment in Ghana
Oboshie Anim-Boamah, Christmal Dela Christmals, Susan Jennifer Armstrong
Nurse Media Journal of Nursing.2021; 11(3): 278. CrossRef
Item development process and analysis of 50 case-based items for implementation on the Korean Nursing Licensing Examination
In Sook Park, Yeon Ok Suh, Hae Sook Park, So Young Kang, Kwang Sung Kim, Gyung Hee Kim, Yeon-Hee Choi, Hyun-Ju Kim
Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2017; 14: 20. CrossRef

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search