Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

JEEHP : Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Author index

Page Path
HOME > Browse articles > Author index
Search
Warren Wiechmann 3 Articles
No difference in factual or conceptual recall comprehension for tablet, laptop, and handwritten note-taking by medical students in the United States: a survey-based observational study  
Warren Wiechmann, Robert Edwards, Cheyenne Low, Alisa Wray, Megan Boysen-Osborn, Shannon Toohey
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2022;19:8.   Published online April 26, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2022.19.8
  • 5,947 View
  • 346 Download
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
Technological advances are changing how students approach learning. The traditional note-taking methods of longhand writing have been supplemented and replaced by tablets, smartphones, and laptop note-taking. It has been theorized that writing notes by hand requires more complex cognitive processes and may lead to better retention. However, few studies have investigated the use of tablet-based note-taking, which allows the incorporation of typing, drawing, highlights, and media. We therefore sought to confirm the hypothesis that tablet-based note-taking would lead to equivalent or better recall as compared to written note-taking.
Methods
We allocated 68 students into longhand, laptop, or tablet note-taking groups, and they watched and took notes on a presentation on which they were assessed for factual and conceptual recall. A second short distractor video was shown, followed by a 30-minute assessment at the University of California, Irvine campus, over a single day period in August 2018. Notes were analyzed for content, supplemental drawings, and other media sources.
Results
No significant difference was found in the factual or conceptual recall scores for tablet, laptop, and handwritten note-taking (P=0.61). The median word count was 131.5 for tablets, 121.0 for handwriting, and 297.0 for laptops (P=0.01). The tablet group had the highest presence of drawing, highlighting, and other media/tools.
Conclusion
In light of conflicting research regarding the best note-taking method, our study showed that longhand note-taking is not superior to tablet or laptop note-taking. This suggests students should be encouraged to pick the note-taking method that appeals most to them. In the future, traditional note-taking may be replaced or supplemented with digital technologies that provide similar efficacy with more convenience.
Formative feedback from the first-person perspective using Google Glass in a family medicine objective structured clinical examination station in the United States  
Julie Youm, Warren Wiechmann
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2018;15:5.   Published online March 7, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2018.15.5
  • 34,833 View
  • 329 Download
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
This case study explored the use of Google Glass in a clinical examination scenario to capture the first-person perspective of a standardized patient as a way to provide formative feedback on students’ communication and empathy skills ‘through the patient’s eyes.’
Methods
During a 3-year period between 2014 and 2017, third-year students enrolled in a family medicine clerkship participated in a Google Glass station during a summative clinical examination. At this station, standardized patients wore Google Glass to record an encounter focused on communication and empathy skills ‘through the patient’s eyes.’ Students completed an online survey using a 4-point Likert scale about their perspectives on Google Glass as a feedback tool (N= 255).
Results
We found that the students’ experiences with Google Glass ‘through the patient’s eyes’ were largely positive and that students felt the feedback provided by the Google Glass recording to be helpful. Although a third of the students felt that Google Glass was a distraction, the majority believed that the first-person perspective recordings provided an opportunity for feedback that did not exist before.
Conclusion
Continuing exploration of first-person perspective recordings using Google Glass to improve education on communication and empathy skills is warranted.
Efficacy of an asynchronous electronic curriculum in emergency medicine education in the United States  
Alisa Wray, Kathryn Bennett, Megan Boysen-Osborn, Warren Wiechmann, Shannon Toohey
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2017;14:29.   Published online December 11, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2017.14.29
  • 30,407 View
  • 232 Download
  • 6 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
The aim of this study was to measure the effect of an iPad-based asynchronous curriculum on emergency medicine resident performance on the in-training exam (ITE). We hypothesized that the implementation of an asynchronous curriculum (replacing 1 hour of weekly didactic time) would result in non-inferior ITE scores compared to the historical scores of residents who had participated in the traditional 5-hour weekly didactic curriculum.
Methods
The study was a retrospective, non-inferiority study. conducted at the University of California, Irvine Emergency Medicine Residency Program. We compared ITE scores from 2012 and 2013, when there were 5 weekly hours of didactic content, with scores from 2014 and 2015, when 1 hour of conference was replaced with asynchro-nous content. Examination results were compared using a non-inferiority data analysis with a 10% margin of difference.
Results
Using a non-inferiority test with a 95% confidence interval, there was no difference between the 2 groups (before and after implementation of asynchronous learning), as the confidence interval for the change of the ITE was −3.5 to 2.3 points, whereas the 10% non-inferiority margin was 7.8 points.
Conclusion
Replacing 1 hour of didactic conference with asynchronous learning showed no negative impact on resident ITE scores.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Development and Validation of Pediatric Opioid Analgesia Self-Instruction System (PedOASIS): An Opioid Knowledge Tool for Pediatric Clinicians
    Rebecca E. MacDonell-Yilmaz, Angela Anderson, Priya Hirway, Jennifer G. Welch
    Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology.2022; 44(1): e204.     CrossRef
  • Utilizing social media for cardiovascular education
    Christina Mansour, Nooshin Beygui, Mamas A Mamas, Purvi J Parwani
    Heart.2022; 108(15): 1240.     CrossRef
  • Nephrology Trainee Education Needs Assessment: Five Years and a Pandemic Later
    Benjamin S. Ko, Kurtis A. Pivert, Rob Rope, Anna M. Burgner, Joshua S. Waitzman, Susan M. Halbach, Suzanne M. Boyle, Lili Chan, Stephen M. Sozio
    Kidney Medicine.2022; 4(11): 100548.     CrossRef
  • Planning Engaging, Remote, Synchronous Didactics in the COVID-19 Pandemic Era
    Ronald Rivera, Jonathan Smart, Sangeeta Sakaria, Alisa Wray, Warren Wiechmann, Megan Boysen-Osborn, Shannon Toohey
    JMIR Medical Education.2021; 7(2): e25213.     CrossRef
  • Pediatric Resident Engagement With an Online Critical Care Curriculum During the Intensive Care Rotation*
    Dennis A. Daniel, Sue E. Poynter, Christopher P. Landrigan, Charles A. Czeisler, Jeffrey P. Burns, Traci A. Wolbrink
    Pediatric Critical Care Medicine.2020; 21(11): 986.     CrossRef
  • Asynchronous Curriculum “Socially Synchronized”: Learning Via Competition
    Jon Smart, Adriana Segura Olson, Andrew Muck
    Western Journal of Emergency Medicine.2018; 20(1): 6.     CrossRef

JEEHP : Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions