Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

JEEHP : Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Author index

Page Path
HOME > Browse articles > Author index
Search
Tetsuo Kimura 1 Article
The impacts of computer adaptive testing from a variety of perspectives  
Tetsuo Kimura
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2017;14:12.   Published online May 29, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2017.14.12
  • 38,298 View
  • 355 Download
  • 13 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Computer adaptive testing (CAT) is a kind of tailored testing, in that it is a form of computer-based testing that is adaptive to each test-taker’s ability level. In this review, the impacts of CAT are discussed from different perspectives in order to illustrate crucial points to keep in mind during the development and implementation of CAT. Test developers and psychometricians often emphasize the efficiency and accuracy of CAT in comparison to traditional linear tests. However, many test-takers report feeling discouraged after taking CATs, and this feeling can reduce learning self-efficacy and motivation. A trade-off must be made between the psychological experiences of test-takers and measurement efficiency. From the perspective of educators and subject matter experts, nonstatistical specifications, such as content coverage, content balance, and form length are major concerns. Thus, accreditation bodies may be faced with a discrepancy between the perspectives of psychometricians and those of subject matter experts. In order to improve test-takers’ impressions of CAT, the author proposes increasing the target probability of answering correctly in the item selection algorithm even if doing so consequently decreases measurement efficiency. Two different methods, CAT with a shadow test approach and computerized multistage testing, have been developed in order to ensure the satisfaction of subject matter experts. In the shadow test approach, a full-length test is assembled that meets the constraints and provides maximum information at the current ability estimate, while computerized multistage testing gives subject matter experts an opportunity to review all test forms prior to administration.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • On Measuring Adaptivity of an Adaptive Test
    Zhongmin Cui
    Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives.2022; 20(1): 21.     CrossRef
  • The Effect of Computerized Adaptive Testing on Motivation and Anxiety: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Hanif Akhtar, Silfiasari, Boglarka Vekety, Kristof Kovacs
    Assessment.2022; : 107319112211009.     CrossRef
  • Performance Decline as an Indicator of Generalized Test-Taking Disengagement
    Steven L. Wise, G. Gage Kingsbury
    Applied Measurement in Education.2022; 35(4): 272.     CrossRef
  • A content validity evaluation of the PEDI-CAT Speedy Mobility domain
    Helene M. Dumas, Maria A. Fragala-Pinkham, Elaine L. Rosen, Pengsheng Ni
    Physiotherapy Theory and Practice.2021; 37(4): 517.     CrossRef
  • Item Parameter Estimation in Multistage Designs: A Comparison of Different Estimation Approaches for the Rasch Model
    Jan Steinfeld, Alexander Robitzsch
    Psych.2021; 3(3): 279.     CrossRef
  • Adaptive Practice Quizzing in a University Lecture: A Pre-Registered Field Experiment
    Svenja Heitmann, Niklas Obergassel, Stefan Fries, Axel Grund, Kirsten Berthold, Julian Roelle
    Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition.2021; 10(4): 603.     CrossRef
  • Development and Test-Item Analysis of a Freely Available 1900-Item Question Bank for Rheumatology Trainees
    Bharat Kumar, Manish Suneja, Melissa L Swee
    Cureus.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Investigating the Viability of Alternating Model Tree As An Item Selection Algorithm for Constructing Computerized Adaptive Psychological Testing
    Jeong-Han Youn, Taehun Lee
    The Korean Journal of Psychology: General.2021; 40(4): 539.     CrossRef
  • Adaptive practice quizzing in a university lecture: A pre-registered field experiment.
    Svenja Heitmann, Niklas Obergassel, Stefan Fries, Axel Grund, Kirsten Berthold, Julian Roelle
    Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition.2021; 10(4): 603.     CrossRef
  • Development of an Item Bank to Measure Medication Adherence: Systematic Review
    Yu Heng Kwan, Livia Jia Yi Oo, Dionne Hui Fang Loh, Jie Kie Phang, Si Dun Weng, Dan V Blalock, Eng Hui Chew, Kai Zhen Yap, Corrinne Yong Koon Tan, Sungwon Yoon, Warren Fong, Truls Østbye, Lian Leng Low, Hayden Barry Bosworth, Julian Thumboo
    Journal of Medical Internet Research.2020; 22(10): e19089.     CrossRef
  • Development of a Computerized Adaptive Version of the Turkish Driving Licence Exam
    Nükhet ÇIKRIKÇI, Seher YALÇIN, İlker KALENDER, Emrah GÜL, Cansu AYAN, Gizem UYUMAZ, Merve ŞAHİN KÜRŞAD, Ömer KAMIŞ
    International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Plus ça change, plus c’est pareil: Making a continued case for the use of MCQs in medical education
    Debra Pugh, André De Champlain, Claire Touchie
    Medical Teacher.2019; 41(5): 569.     CrossRef
  • Review: Patient-reported outcomes in multiple sclerosis care
    Emanuele D'Amico, Rocco Haase, Tjalf Ziemssen
    Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders.2019; 33: 61.     CrossRef

JEEHP : Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions