Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

JEEHP : Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Author index

Page Path
HOME > Browse articles > Author index
Search
Sean P. Riley 1 Article
Selectivity of physiotherapist programs in the United States does not differ by institutional funding source or research activity level  
Sean P. Riley, Kyle Covington, Michel D. Landry, Christine McCallum, Chalee Engelhard, Chad E. Cook
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2016;13:17.   Published online April 15, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2016.13.17
  • 25,702 View
  • 146 Download
  • 4 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
This study aimed to compare selectivity characteristics among institution characteristics to determine differences by institutional funding source (public vs. private) or research activity level (research vs. non-research). Methods: This study included information provided by the Commission on Accreditation in Physical Therapy Education (CAPTE) and the Federation of State Boards of Physical Therapy. Data were extracted from all students who graduated in 2011 from accredited physical therapy programs in the United States. The public and private designations of the institutions were extracted directly from the classifications from the ‘CAPTE annual accreditation report,’ and high and low research activity was determined based on Carnegie classifications. The institutions were classified into four groups: public/research intensive, public/non-research intensive, private/research intensive, and private/non-research intensive. Descriptive and comparison analyses with post hoc testing were performed to determine whether there were statistically significant differences among the four groups. Results: Although there were statistically significant baseline grade point average differences among the four categorized groups, there were no significant differences in licensure pass rates or for any of the selectivity variables of interest. Conclusion: Selectivity characteristics did not differ by institutional funding source (public vs. private) or research activity level (research vs. non-research). This suggests that the concerns about reduced selectivity among physiotherapy programs, specifically the types that are experiencing the largest proliferation, appear less warranted.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Predictors of research productivity among physical therapy programs in the United States: an observational study
    David M. Rowland, Amanda A. Murphy, Hannah R. Manik, Chris Y. Lane, Deborah L. Givens, Chad E. Cook, Alessandra Narciso Garcia
    BMC Medical Education.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Impact of funding allocation on physical therapist research productivity and DPT student graduates: an analysis using panel data
    Tara Dickson, P. Daniel Chen, Barrett Taylor
    Advances in Health Sciences Education.2019; 24(2): 269.     CrossRef
  • Predicting performance in health professions education programs from admissions information – Comparisons of other health professions with pharmacy
    Richard E. Wilcox, Kenneth A. Lawson
    Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning.2018; 10(4): 529.     CrossRef
  • 20th Pauline Cerasoli Lecture: The Sunk Cost Fallacy
    Chad Cook
    Journal of Physical Therapy Education.2017; 31(3): 10.     CrossRef

JEEHP : Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions