Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

JEEHP : Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Articles

Page Path
HOME > J Educ Eval Health Prof > Volume 13; 2016 > Article
Research article
Learning styles, academic achievement, and mental health problems among medical students in Thailand
Salilthip Paiboonsithiwong1orcid, Natchaya Kunanitthaworn1orcid, Natchaphon Songtrijuck1orcid, Nahathai Wongpakaran2*orcid, Tinakon Wongpakaran2orcid

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2016.13.38
Published online: October 31, 2016

1Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand

2Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand

*Corresponding email: nahathai.wongpakaran@cmu.ac.th

: 

• Received: July 24, 2016   • Accepted: October 30, 2016

© 2016, Korea Health Personnel Licensing Examination Institute

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • 32,651 Views
  • 411 Download
  • 15 Web of Science
  • 16 Crossref
  • 15 Scopus
  • Purpose
    This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of various learning styles among medical students and their correlations with academic achievement and mental health problems in these students.
  • Methods
    This study was conducted among 140 first-year medical students of Chiang Mai University, Thailand in 2014. The participants completed the visual-aural-read/write-kinesthetic (VARK) questionnaire, the results of which can be categorized into 4 modes, corresponding to how many of the 4 types are preferred by a respondent. The 10-item Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) and the 21-item Outcome Inventory (OI-21) were also used. The participants’ demographic data, grade point average (GPA), and scores of all measurements are presented using simple statistics. Correlation and regression analysis were employed to analyze differences in the scores and to determine the associations among them.
  • Results
    Sixty percent of the participants were female. The mean age was 18.86±0.74 years old. Quadmodal was found to be the most preferred VARK mode (43.6%). Unimodal, bimodal, and trimodal modes were preferred by 35%, 12.9%, and 18.6% of the participants, respectively. Among the strong unimodal learners, visual, aural, read/write, and kinesthetic preferences were reported by 4.3%, 7.1%, 11.4%, and 12.1% of participants, respectively. No difference was observed in the PSS-10, OI-anxiety, OI-depression, and OI-somatization scores according to the VARK modes, although a significant effect was found for OI-interpersonal (F=2.788, P=0.043). Moreover, neither VARK modes nor VARK types were correlated with GPA.
  • Conclusion
    The most preferred VARK learning style among medical students was quadmodal. Learning styles were not associated with GPA or mental health problems, except for interpersonal problems.
Learning style is an individual’s characteristic method of gaining knowledge, skills, and attitudes through study or experiences [1]. Among the different models that have been proposed, the visual, aural, read/write, and kinesthetic (VARK) model developed by Neil Fleming is one of the most frequently used methods, and describes preferences in terms of 4 types of preferred learning styles (visual, aural, read/write, and kinesthetic) [2]. Learning preferences are also categorized into 4 modes (unimodal, bimodal, trimodal, and quadmodal), based on the number of learning types preferred. The VARK tool is commonly used by researchers in a variety of disciplines, including medical education.
Studying medicine requires a variety of modes of learning. In previous reports, 56.0% to 86.8% of medical students chose multiple modes of learning. Among the multiple-mode possibilities, 27.6%–43.4% preferred quadmodal learning, and 30.3%–41.0% preferred bimodal learning [3,4,5,6]. Many reports have found unimodal learning to be most prevalent (53.8%–81.9%) [7,8]. Within unimodal learners, aural (21.2%) and kinesthetic (30.1%) were the 2 most preferred VARK styles [3,7,9,10]. Some studies found that the preference of visual and read/write learning styles was associated with gender. However, other studies have reported that VARK results were not associated with gender [7].
Inconsistent findings have been reported regarding the relationship between learning styles and academic achievement [11]. Whether preferred learning styles have an impact on academic achievement among medical students remains unknown. Learning styles and study habits may also predict a medical student’s approaches to and satisfaction with work, stress, and mental health, both when applying to medical school and in the final year. Prior performance may not only predict achievement among students, but also be associated with future achievement at the postgraduate level (i.e., during residency training).
However, the relationships among learning styles, achievement, stress, and mental health require further analysis. To our knowledge, no evidence exists regarding VARK styles, stress, and mental health among medical students. Therefore, our study aimed to explore the prevalence of various learning styles according to the VARK framework among medical students, the correlations between academic achievement and learning styles, and the correlations of stress and mental health problems with the learning styles of these students. Insights about how students learn can result in improved understanding and detection of learners who are at risk of stress-related health problems in medical school.
Study design and subjects
The study employed a cross-sectional design. A total of 140 of the 250 first-year medical students attending Chiang Mai University were recruited in the 2014 academic year.
Measurement
The measurement tools used included demographic data and grade point average (GPA). Other measures included are listed below.
Thai version of the visual, aural, read/write, and kinesthetic questionnaire version 7.1
VARK is a tool that categorizes learning styles into 4 types (visual, aural, read/write, and kinesthetic). The 4 modes of VARK depend on the number of VARK types chosen (unimodal, bimodal, trimodal, and quadmodal). VARK is commonly used in the education field in a variety of disciplines, including the medical sciences. A Thai version has been made available [12]. The VARK questionnaire contains 16 items, and each has 4 choices reflecting different learning style preferences. More than 1 answer can be endorsed for each item if that matches the participant’s perceptions. The reliability (α) scores of the learning styles are 0.85, 0.82, 0.84, and 0.77 for the visual, aural, read/write, and kinesthetic styles, respectively [13].
Outcome inventory, 21 items
The 21-item outcome inventory (OI-21) is a self-rating questionnaire that measures 4 common mental health problems (depression, anxiety, somatic symptoms, and interpersonal difficulties). The OI-21 contains 21 questions using a 5-choice Likert scale ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (always). The Cronbach α value was found to be 0.92, and its concurrent validity with different measures has been well studied. This tool takes approximately 5–10 minutes to complete [14].
Thai version of the 10-item Perceived Stress Scale
It consists of 10 questions on a 5-choice Likert scale ranging from 0 (never) to 4 (very often), and can be completed within 3–5 minutes. It comprises 2 structures: stress, which is measured by 6 questions, and control, which is measured using 4 questions. The Thai version of 10-item Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) had a Cronbach α (total) of 0.85, and an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.82. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the goodness-of-fit index was 0.981, the root mean square residual was 0.022, the standardized root mean square residual was 0.037, the comparative fit index was 0.989, the normed fit index was 0.96, the non-normed fit index was 0.981, and the root mean square error of approximation was 0.031 [15].
Statistical analysis
Descriptive statistics was used to analyze the participants’ demographic data, such as gender and age. Analysis of variance was used to compare VARK modes among different GPA, PSS, and OI groups. The predictive power of VARK type on GPA was evaluated using regression analysis. IBM SPSS for Windows ver. 22.0 (IBM Co., Armonk, NY, USA) was used to analyze the data. An α value of 95% was applied throughout.
Ethical approval
Informed consent was obtained from the participants. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Thailand (IRB no. 004/2015).
Among the 140 participants, the average age was 18.86±0.74 years. The majority (60%) were women. The most prevalent VARK types and modes were kinesthetic (35%) and quadmodal (43.57%) (Fig. 1). Table 1 shows the mean and standard deviation of VARK types and the frequency of VARK modes. No significant differences were observed regarding VARK types or modes between male and female participants. In terms of academic achievement, only the kinesthetic type had a significantly negative correlation with GPA in the first semester (time 1). No significant differences were found between other VARK types, VARK modes, and GPA (Tables 2, 3). No differences were observed among VARK types or modes with regard to the PSS score. No significant differences were found regarding VARK mode and the OI score, except for interpersonal difficulties, for which trimodal participants obtained the highest score. Trimodal learning was associated with significantly higher interpersonal difficulties scores than quadmodal learning (P=0.040) (Tables 4, 5).
The present study showed that most medical students (65%) had a preference for multimodal VARK learning, which is similar to what has been reported in previous studies. Among these, quadmodal was the most preferred (43.57%) mode of learning. These findings are similar to those of previous studies that reported multiple modes to be the most preferred learning style, with quadmodal learning being the most prevalent among first-year or preclinical students [3,4], while Baykan and Nacar [5] and Prithishkumar and Michael [6] reported that bimodal was the most preferred VARK mode. The authors conjecture that culture and curriculum may contribute to these discrepancies. Our findings imply that medical students preferred their instructors to use different methods of teaching to ensure effective learning. Although the students’ learning preferences were not associated with variations in learning outcomes, providing opportunities to express these abilities and skills may result in success.
In terms of VARK types among individuals who preferred unimodal learning, kinesthetic was the most common learning style. The finding that the visual learning style was found the least preferred type in this study is in line with previous reports [3,4]. The reason that students did not prefer visual learning is unknown, although it constitutes 1 of the 4 required skills for clinical examinations (inspection, palpation, percussion, and auscultation). This may reflect the fact that the participants were surveyed while they were in their first year of medical school. Visual strategies may be least used at that stage of learning because the curriculum design of the first year differs from that of higher levels, especially clinical years where visual ability is required for activities such as using a microscope in histology or pathology classes, investigating structures in anatomy class, examining patients in the clinical years, and so on. This finding may assist curriculum developers in designing a preparatory course for students to enhance their visual strategies in the early years of study. Academic achievement, as defined by GPA, was not related to VARK mode. This finding is consistent with the results reported by Almigbal [7].
In general, achievement outcomes differ in many details, with examples including paper examination scores and rankings, laboratory scores, group assignments or reports, objective structured clinical examinations, and so on. GPA, as a representative measure of academic achievement, may not be sensitive enough to show the differences among VARK learning styles. Therefore, the authors do not recommend that GPA should be used as the only outcome measure for academic achievement. Interestingly, the kinesthetic learning style was found to be negatively related to GPA. This might be because among preclinical students, more time was spent on lectures and learning theories than in practical learning due to the design of the curriculum.
While modes of VARK learning were not associated with perceived stress, anxiety, depression, or somatization, individuals who preferred trimodal VARK learning reported higher scores on the interpersonal difficulties subscale than others. Since insufficient information is available to explain this relationship, further study of this issue might be encouraged. In addition, repeated outcomes and longitudinal monitoring may be warranted.
In conclusion, the most preferred learning style among medical students was quadmodal. Learning styles were not associated with academic achievement or mental health. However, the trimodal learning style was associated with interpersonal problems.

Conflict of interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Funding

This study was supported by a research grant of Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand in 2014.

Audio recording of abstract
jeehp-13-38-abstract-recording.avi
Supplement 1. Raw data of the survey.
jeehp-13-38-supple-1.xlsx
Fig. 1.
Types of visual-aural-read/write-kinesthetic learning styles of 140 first-year medical students of Chiang Mai University, Thailand in 2014.
jeehp-13-38f1.gif
Table 1.
Differences in VARK types and modes according to gender among 140 first-year medical students of Chiang Mai University, Thailand in 2014
VARK Male Female P-value
Types
 Visual 5.25±2.6 4.86±2.6 0.086
 Aural 5.1±2.4 5.13±2.5 0.532
 Read/write 5.35±2.4 5.08±2.4 0.392
 Kinesthetic 5.1±2.7 5.85±2.4 0.937
Modes 0.406
 Unimodal 15 (10.7) 34 (24.3)
 Bimodal 8 (5.7) 10 (7.1)
 Trimodal 6 (4.3) 6 (4.3)
 Quadmodal 27 (19.3) 34 (24.3)

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%).

VARK, visual-aural-read/write-kinesthetic.

Table 2.
Grade point average according to VARK mode among 140 first-year medical students of Chiang Mai University, Thailand in 2014
Mean±standard deviation Fa) P-value
VARK mode 0.339 0.797
 Unimodal 3.68±0.20
 Bimodal 3.62±0.33
 Trimodal 3.63±0.34
 Quadmodal 3.64±0.28

VARK, visual-aural-read/write-kinesthetic.

a) F statistics.

Table 3.
Correlations between visual-aural-read/write-kinesthetic types and grade point average at 2 time points among 140 first-year medical students of Chiang Mai University, Thailand in 2014
First-semester GPA (time 1) Second-semester GPA (time 2)
Visual 0.001 0.038
Aural 0.030 0.047
Read/write -0.059 0.026
Kinesthetic -0.167* -0.144

GPA, grade point average.

* P<0.05 (two-tailed).

Table 4.
Mean scores of the PSS and OI according to visual-aural-read/write-kinesthetic mode among 140 first-year medical students of Chiang Mai University, Thailand in 2014
Variable Unimodal Bimodal Trimodal Quadmodal Fa) (3, 136) P-value
PSS 16.00±5.6 16.28±4.8 17.17±5.3 15.28±5.0 0.554 0.646
OI_anxiety 13.94±4.5 15.07±3.6 15.92±3.6 13.74±4.2 1.225 0.303
OI_depression 7.71±3.1 7.69±2.5 8.17±3.0 7.43±2.3 0.292 0.831
OI_interpersonal difficulties 8.24±3.0 8.78±2.8 10.08±4.1 7.53±2.8 2.788 0.043
OI_somatization 11.51±3.1 10.17±3.6 10.25±2.5 10.57±3.9 1.047 0.374

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.

PSS, Perceived Stress Scale; OI, Outcome Inventory.

a) F statistics.

Table 5.
Multiple comparison of visual-aural-read/write-kinesthetic modes concerning interpersonal difficulties among 140 first-year medical students of Chiang Mai University, Thailand in 2014 using post hoc analysis (Tukey honest significant difference)
(I) Type of mode (J) Type of mode Mean difference (I-J) Standard error P-value 95% confidence interval
Lower bound Upper bound
Unimodal Bimodal -0.53 0.83 0.918 -2.69 1.63
Trimodal -1.84 0.97 0.236 -4.36 0.69
Quadmodal 0.72 0.58 0.602 -0.79 2.22
Bimodal Unimodal 0.53 0.83 0.918 -1.63 2.69
Trimodal -1.31 1.12 0.652 -4.23 1.62
Quadmodal 1.25 0.81 0.413 -0.85 3.35
Trimodal Unimodal 1.84 0.97 0.236 -0.69 4.36
Bimodal 1.31 1.12 0.652 -1.62 4.23
Quadmodal 2.56* 0.95 0.040 0.08 5.03
Quadmodal Unimodal -0.72 0.58 0.602 -2.22 0.79
Bimodal -1.25 0.81 0.413 -3.35 0.85
Trimodal -2.56* 0.95 0.040 -5.03 -0.08

* P<0.05.

Figure & Data

References

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  
    • Learning styles in science education at university level: A systematic review
      Albina R. Shaidullina, Natalia A. Orekhovskaya, Evgeny G. Panov, Marina N. Svintsova, Oksana N. Petyukova, Nataliya S. Zhuykova, Elena V. Grigoryeva
      Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education.2023; 19(7): em2293.     CrossRef
    • The Mediating Role of Precepts and Meditation on Attachment and Depressive Symptoms in Adolescents
      Justin DeMaranville, Tinakon Wongpakaran, Nahathai Wongpakaran, Danny Wedding
      Healthcare.2023; 11(13): 1923.     CrossRef
    • Learning styles and their relationship with preferred teaching methodologies and academic achievement among medical students in teaching medical college, Tamil Nadu
      Tamilarasan Muniyapillai, Karthikeyan Kulothungan, ShagirunishaRizvana Abdul Malik, ShekshiJanet Jeevaraj, Shrimathi Ashokan, Sindhurajeswari Ravichandran, Sivaranjani Ambalavanan, Sowmiya Jayaraman
      Journal of Education and Health Promotion.2023; 12(1): 256.     CrossRef
    • “METAPAD” (METAbolic PAthways Decoded) – a gaming innovation to ease the complexity of metabolic pathways by promoting self-directed, active, participatory learning in small groups
      Krishna Mohan Surapaneni
      BMC Medical Education.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Depression and Its Associated Factors among Undergraduate Engineering Students: A Cross-Sectional Survey in Thailand
      Yuanyue Huang, Tinakon Wongpakaran, Nahathai Wongpakaran, Patraporn Bhatarasakoon, Preda Pichayapan, Shirley Worland
      Healthcare.2023; 11(16): 2334.     CrossRef
    • Estilos de aprendizaje y salud mental en estudiantes de educación superior tecnológica
      Diego Armando Santos Pazos, Adriana Salomé Polo Ureña, Verónica Adriana Freire Palacios, Jeniffer Vanessa Palacios Moreno
      Anatomía Digital.2023; 6(4.3): 468.     CrossRef
    • The impact of the transition from flipped classroom to online lectures on learning outcomes and student satisfaction in a rehabilitation medicine clerkship during the COVID-19 pandemic
      Phichamon Khanittanuphong, Khanin Iamthanaporn, Jongdee Bvonpanttarananon
      BMC Medical Education.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • The association between learning styles and academic achievement among medical students
      Abdulaziz Alturki, Eyad Alsuhaibani, Waleed Mufarrih, Hessah Alsayahi, Roba Altameem, Nouf Almansour, Yara Alessa, Arwa Abdulsalam, Ibrahim Alodhaibi, Bandar Alzuair, Reham Alturki
      International Journal of Medicine in Developing Countries.2021; : 751.     CrossRef
    • Instruments to evaluate undergraduate healthcare student learning styles globally: A scoping review
      Daniel Gonçalves Campos, Juliany Lino Gomes Silva, Melissa Jarvill, Roberta Cunha M. Rodrigues, Ana Railka de Souza Oliveira Kumakura, Daniel Gonçalves Campos
      Nurse Education Today.2021; 107: 105141.     CrossRef
    • Identifying learning styles of language learners: A useful step in moving towards the learner-centred approach
      Sudarat PAYAPROM, Yupares PAYAPROM
      Dil ve Dilbilimi Çalışmaları Dergisi.2020; 16(1): 59.     CrossRef
    • Use of Learning Style Frameworks in Health Science Education
      Lindsey Childs-Kean, Mary Edwards, Mary Douglass Smith
      American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.2020; 84(7): ajpe7885.     CrossRef
    • Preferred teaching styles of medical faculty: an international multi-center study
      Nihar Ranjan Dash, Salman Yousuf Guraya, Mohammad Tahseen Al Bataineh, Mohamed Elhassan Abdalla, Muhamad Saiful Bahri Yusoff, Mona Faisal Al-Qahtani, Walther N. K. A. van Mook, Muhammad Saeed Shafi, Hamdi Hameed Almaramhy, Wail Nuri Osman Mukhtar
      BMC Medical Education.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Study Habits of Dental Students of Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences (2018)
      Abdolreza Gilavand
      Educational Research in Medical Sciences.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Does MMPI assessed at medical school admission predict psychological problems in later years?
      Kulvadee Thongpibul, Pairada Varnado, Nahathai Wongpakaran, Tinakon Wongpakaran, Pimolpun Kuntawong, Danny Wedding
      BMC Research Notes.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Are There Gender-Dependent Study Habits of Medical Students in Times of the World Wide Web?
      A. Benditz, L. Pulido, T. Renkawitz, T. Schwarz, J. Grifka, M. Weber
      BioMed Research International.2018; 2018: 1.     CrossRef
    • DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ FAKÜLTESİ ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN ÖĞRENME STİLLERİNİN İKİ FARKLI YÖNTEMLE ANALİZİ
      Ayşe KOÇAK BÜYÜKDERE
      Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi.2018; : 371.     CrossRef

    Figure
    We recommend

    JEEHP : Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions