|
|
0 |
7 |
8 |
10 |
Background and research |
Team utilizes effective research skills to develop appropriate background into topic presentation. |
Background information was not present. |
Did not provide adequate background information and/or learning objectives and did not address primary literature, if applicable. Background information was not reliable. |
Some evidence that pertinent literature or clinical trials were utilized or identified, if applicable. Learning objectives and background info were acceptable. |
Identifies pertinent primary literature related to topic if applicable, provided appropriate learning objectives, and assessed and critiqued pertinent statistical analysis, if applicable. Provided reliable background information. |
|
|
0 |
21 |
25 |
30 |
Formatting and content of presentation |
Team develops quality presentation with appropriate content and professional formatting. |
PowerPoint presentation displays lack of understanding of topic. Presentation formatting and referencing extremely poor, inconsistent, and unprofessional. |
Team develops PowerPoint presentation with content that displays partial understanding of topic. Several formatting and referencing issues existed throughout. |
Team develops quality PowerPoint presentation with content that displays acceptable understanding of topic. Presentation formatting contained minimal grammatical and spelling errors. Referencing was mostly accurate and consistent. |
Team develops quality PowerPoint presentation with content that displays complete understanding of topic, and formatting and referencing are professional and consistent. |
Team application |
Team develops effective application to enhance understanding of topic and challenge critical thinking. |
Application exercise lacked creativity and effort and did not challenge critical thinking or enhance understanding of topic. |
Application exercise was developed but was minimally effective in challenging student's critical thinking and/or enhancing understanding of topic. |
Application exercise is acceptable and challenges student's critical thinking skills to enhance understanding of topic. |
Application exercise demonstrates creativity and innovation to challenge student's critical thinking skills and enhance understanding of topic. |
|
|
0 |
7 |
8 |
10 |
Communication |
Team displays effective communication techniques to deliver material in an organized manner that enhances learning. |
Does not communicate the presentation and module effectively. Team is unfamiliar with case; reads the handout or slides. |
Communicates the presentation and module in an unorganized and unfamiliar manner. Team answered questions with lack of confidence or little detail. |
Communicates the presentation in an organized, familiar manner that does not impede understanding. Answered questions with sufficient detail and accuracy. |
Clearly and effectively communicates the presentation and module in an organized manner that enhances understanding. |
Team cannot answer questions appropriately. |
|
|
Answered questions thoroughly, accurately, and with confidence. |
Time management |
Team displays effective use of time to administer topic module. |
Team either rushes through presentation and activity (completed <30 min) or not able to start application due to length of presentation. |
Team completes presentation but did not deliver effective activity due to lack of appropriate time management. |
Team completes all portions of module and exercise but had to rush through portions of the activities in order to complete. |
Team utilizes time effectively to complete all portions of module and active learning exercise. |
Exam questions |
Develops appropriate exam questions based on module content |
Assignment not completed. |
Team develops < 10 exam questions and/or question structure significantly lacks ability to evaluate basic knowledge. |
Team develops 10 exam questions but structure of some questions needs to be revised to more appropriately evaluate basic knowledge. |
Team develops 10 exam questions based on module content that appropriately evaluates basic knowledge. |